Winning by a close margin in a unique public poll system, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) beat former premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) in the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) primary for next year’s presidential election.
Despite some controversial political maneuverings by certain DPP factions and individuals against him, Su displayed a gentlemanly manner by not only accepting the results, but also calling for his supporters to stand behind Tsai. Tsai, in her victory speech, called for the DPP to unify and win the presidency and legislature come January.
Both Tsai and Su deserve much credit for leading the opposition in a moderate, pragmatic direction and introducing a gradual “generation change” to the DPP. To maintain party unity, both of them refrained from attacking each other and centered their campaigns on personality and policy. As Tsai said afterward, it is not a victory for the individual, but a victory for the DPP that matters.
A unified DPP stands a better chance of beating President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), as indicated by the results of the poll, which showed both Tsai and Su leading Ma by almost 7 percentage points. The poll underlined Ma’s leadership crisis. Even among most polls following the DPP’s primary conducted by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-friendly media such as the China Times and the United Daily News, Tsai and Ma would be neck-and-neck were the presidential election to be held tomorrow. The DPP and Tsai are off to a good start.
Nevertheless, Tsai is facing tremendous challenges. First and foremost is the need to maintain party unity and bridge the gap with other heavyweights. Tsai’s close victory over Su showed that she needs the former premier’s help in the election. The so-called “Tsai-Su ticket” may not be possible owing to Su’s earlier pledge that he would not be Tsai’s running mate if he lost, but his support would allow Tsai to take advantage of Su’s popularity among the DPP’s rank and file. Given that Su lost to Tsai by only 1.35 percentage points in the poll, he could definitely play a significant role in campaigning for the DPP in the next nine months. By cooperating with Su, Tsai would strengthen her leadership within the party and add to her chances of unseating Ma.
While Tsai has been successfully highlighting her philosophy of “generation change,” campaigning on the promise of change as US President Barack Obama did in his campaign, ever since she led the DPP out of the shadow of electoral defeat in 2008, her lack of administrative and legislative experience have presented her with difficulties.
Still, Tsai’s fresh image as a non-traditional DPP leader, as well as her efforts to lead the party toward the middle ground, help position her as a new-generation leader for the DPP. Moreover, the DPP has long been unfairly portrayed as “anti-China” or “a troublemaker” when it comes to cross-strait relations. As an expert on cross-strait relations, national security and Taiwan’s international legal status, Tsai has strengthened the DPP’s perceived weakness in managing Taiwan’s relationship with China.
By winning the candidacy, Tsai can continue her efforts to outline the DPP’s 10-year policy platform. On cross-strait policy, Tsai has set the tone for the DPP to “seek consensus from difference in a peaceful way” with the Chinese Communist Party. In terms of how to engage a rising China, Tsai shared her thoughts with other DPP leaders like Su to introduce a balanced approach of reaching out to China by connecting with the global system. In other words, the DPP’s future cross-strait policy direction, grounded in pragmatism and moderation, would carefully weigh geo-political changes and strengthen Taiwan’s ties with the US and its Asian allies while pursuing peaceful engagement with China. Beijing is not expected to back down on its demands for the DPP’s acceptance of the “one China” principle and the so-called “1992 consensus.”
However, the presidential election will center more on the candidates’ abilities to tackle domestic issues, such as the widening gap between the rich and the poor, the lack of concrete measures to alleviate unemployment, skyrocketing real-estate prices, the creation of a “nuclear-free homeland” and exploration of “renewable energy.”
Cross-strait policy will not be the sole determining factor in the elections.
Still, Tsai and the DPP need to come up with a feasible policy blueprint to win more public trust.
Liu Shih-chung is a senior research fellow at the Taipei-based Taiwan Brain Trust.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations