Without much fanfare, the past few months have seen no anti-US demonstrations and no burning of US flags across the Arab world. Arabs seem increasingly willing to accept — and even applaud — US President Barack Obama’s administration’s policy toward the region.
Of course, Arabs are still unhappy with the US’ continued bias toward Israel. Its inability to end the 44-year military occupation of Palestinian lands has not gone unnoticed. However, many Arabs nowadays prefer to give the US a break. With the exception of the Obama administration’s lack of resolve in denouncing the treatment of protesters by the US-allied regimes in Bahrain and Yemen, the US’ position on the Arab revolts has been welcomed.
Arabs, especially young Arabs, who comprise the majority of the region’s population, look up to the US for its global power when it upholds democratic morals and values. There is high respect for the concept of rule of, by, and for the people, as well as for the US Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of expression. It is precisely the failure to apply these values in areas such as Palestine or Iraq that has made — and can still make — countless Arabs vehemently anti-US.
Obama’s election two years ago positively shocked Arabs and empowered Arab democrats, who saw it as proof of the US’ true democratic nature. Obama’s Cairo speech, delivered on one of his first foreign trips, promised a new US-Arab beginning, and certainly invigorated Arab democrats.
However, the first test of Obama’s foreign leadership disappointed many Arabs. A US veto of a UN Security Council resolution — supported by the Council’s 14 other members — to oppose Israeli settlements seemed to signal that Obama had crumbled under pressure from the US’ pro-Israel lobby. The US had not revised its policy, even with an African immigrant’s son in the White House.
A more positive view of Obama emerged when the Arab revolts began in Tunisia and Egypt — countries with pro-US regimes. While the US initially demonstrated prudence in word and deed, it quickly understood that the revolts truly reflected the will of the people and acted to align itself with the democratic cause.
The same people that Obama had called on in his Cairo speech to seek democracy had now formed the most important nonviolent movement the world had seen in decades. Arab youth had finally moved, and Obama and his team made the right statements to encourage them, while also making it clear to the Egyptian and Tunisian regimes that they could no longer hide behind the claim that they were fighting the US’ war in north Africa.
Pulling away from dictators without trying to take credit for or hijack the revolt was exactly what was required. Arab youth had to fight and win democracy for themselves. All that what was wanted from the US, most of the young people thought, was withdrawal of its support for allies like former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak and other Arab dictators.
In Libya, however, the need was different. The same energy on display in Cairo and Tunis was evident among Libyan youth, but this time, the US was able to do little diplomatically because it had no relationship with Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi.
So, no surprise, the energy of Libyan youth ran head-on into Qaddafi’s inclination toward brutality and, more importantly, into his paid mercenaries. The US had a moral responsibility to protect the young people whom Obama had encouraged. Another type of help was needed, but deciding what form it should take was complicated.
Arab countries, especially Egypt, had hundreds of thousands of their nationals working in Libya. Their governments saw themselves as Qaddafi’s hostages. However, what the Arab countries couldn’t do with military support, they were able to do by providing political cover for the military intervention led by the US, Britain and France.
The Gulf countries, which have no citizens working in Libya, were the first to denounce Qaddafi. Then the Arab League met to follow the Gulf states’ lead. With angry young Arabs from different countries demonstrating outside its Cairo offices and demanding support for their Libyan brethren, the Arab League took an uncharacteristic position: It agreed to denounce a fellow Arab leader. Clearly, the Arab world was changing, and the US was suddenly no longer an enemy, but a friend.
After gaining UN Security Council support, the US, Europe and some Arab countries began doing exactly what should be expected of the international community when a government is preparing to butcher its own citizens: prevent the slaughter.
Of course, the US’ problems with Arabs and its challenges in the Middle East are far from over. Obama must still fulfill his promises to celebrate with Palestinians their full membership in the UN this fall and to draw down its forces in Afghanistan.
However, for the moment, Arabs are not demonstrating against the US. Instead, with the US’ help, they are enjoying the first blush of freedom.
Daoud Kuttab is general manager of the Community Media Network in Amman, Jordan, and a former professor of journalism at -Princeton University.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.