Opportunism is outdated
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) should not have allowed former chairman Hsu Hsin-liang (許信良) to become “the least likely candidate to win the party’s presidential nomination,” as well as “the one who received the most attention when the three candidates recently presented their campaign platforms” (“Differing views show DPP maturity,” April 13, page 8)
Hsu’s advocacy of an EU-type confederation between China and Taiwan and his support for a “bravely go west” policy implies the DPP should reformulate its overall thinking about the present existence and preservation of “one China, one Taiwan,” and its “strengthen the base, bravely go west” policy.
However, in order for democratization to continue in Taiwan and for it to begin in China, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Hsu need to think more clearly about the political ideologies that stall progress in cross-strait relations.
Does the CCP’s insistence on the fictitious “1992 consensus” and “one China” principle as the basis of unequal cross-strait negotiations contribute the most to cross-strait hostility?
What about the KMT’s insistence on reserving its most pointed criticism for fellow compatriots within the DPP, but fawning over Beijing’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林)?
Finally, why does Hsu’s policy to “bravely go west” address only the direction Taiwan should move in?
Since cross-strait socioeconomic relations involve China and Taiwan, both states should compromise.
As the “consummate opportunist,” Hsu has consistently shown his enthusiasm for supporting whatever politics he believes will benefit him most.
In the 1970s, the dangwai — outside the party — movement gained momentum. With activists and other local politicians already agitating for democratic reform, then-KMT politician Hsu finally began to criticize his party before joining the democratization movement.
In 1990, as a member of the DPP’s Formosa faction, Hsu opposed the inclusion of Taiwan independence in the party platform. Indeed, following its increased emphasis on de jure Taiwan independence, the DPP received merely 24 percent of the vote in the 1991 National Assembly elections.
Although immediate Taiwan independence may not be viable now, the continued pan-green promotion of Taiwan consciousness will make eventual Taiwan independence possible, if not likely. If Hsu had his way, Taiwan independence would have remained the pipedream of Taiwan Independence Party supporters.
In 1999, Hsu remained unabashedly self-interested. Rather than campaign for then-DPP presidential candidate Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), Hsu ran as an independent.
In 2004, Hsu sought to capitalize on the uncertain electoral prospects of the DPP and overall political turmoil by supporting then-vice president Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party leader James Soong (宋楚瑜) for president and vice president respectively.
Currently, Hsu draws attention to himself by basically offering United Daily News editorials as national policy.
To counter Hsu’s stunts, DPP presidential hopeful Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should harness the party’s “democratic maturity” to create clear, progressive, alternative frameworks and policies that will make apparent the anachronism that is the “1992 consensus.”
Forget pan-green, go Green
The DPP is currently conducting a series of debates to select its candidate for next year’s presidential election.
The nuclear crisis in Japan has thrust the issue of nuclear power into the spotlight. It is likely that the DPP’s candidate will promote a policy to phase out nuclear power in Taiwan. Whether they will actually be able to achieve this if they are elected to office is another question. Chen Shui-bian had promised to stop construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant before he was elected president in 2000. Ultimately, construction of the plant went ahead, as Chen faced intense political opposition to his plan after he was elected.
The plan for construction of the Kuokuang Petrochemical plant on reclaimed wetlands in Changhua County is also a contentious issue. The DPP’s presidential candidate is likely to oppose this plan. Whether the DPP will actually stop the project if it wins the presidency is another question.
Although the DPP has made promises on some key environmental issues, it cannot be considered a capital “G” green party despite its appropriation of the color. It is still committed to the promotion of a model of industrial development that is ultimately antithetical to protection of the environment.
I suggest that Green Party Taiwan and environmental non-governmental organizations join together to nominate their own candidate for president in the forthcoming election. While such a candidate would have no chance of winning, they would be able to act as a voice for people’s concerns about a broad range of environmental issues.
Climate change, energy policy, water resources and industrial pollution are key issues that affect the livelihood of everyone in Taiwan. These issues are complex and interrelated. They demand a bold plan rather than a piecemeal approach of opposing or stopping certain projects. A Green Party presidential candidate could help the environment movement articulate a comprehensive vision for Taiwan’s future based on a broad range of policies.
Although victory in next year’s presidential election might be elusive, a Green Party candidate could be a pioneer for the day Taiwan elects its first truly Green president.
China took advantage of the vacuum left behind when US carriers stayed out of the western Pacific Ocean due to COVID-19 outbreaks on several US Navy warships. The Chinese government is solidifying its hold on artificial islands in the South China Sea by moving in missiles and surveillance equipment, and formalizing its occupation by creating two municipal districts in the region under Hainan Island’s Sansha — Xisha District on Woody Island (Yongxing Island, 永興島) to administer the Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島) and Nansha District on Fiery Cross Reef (Yongshu Reef, 永暑島) to administer the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島) —
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) yesterday wrapped up its annual party conference-cum-national decision-making forums in Beijing: the National People’s Congress (NPC) and National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), known colloquially as the “two meetings.” They are normally tightly choreographed affairs, designed to project an image of stability and unassailable strength, but several events leading up this month’s sessions provided strong indications that all is not well in the state of Denmark. The first sign of major discontent came in March, at the height of the COVID-19 crisis in China, when an article by real-estate tycoon Ren Zhiqiang
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a