Cyberstalking is now more common than physical harassment, according to new figures due to be released this week, with many victims finding themselves pursued by complete strangers online.
The first study of its kind to look at the extent and effect of cyberstalking, taking in social networking sites, e-mail and mobile phones, has revealed the profile of perpetrators to be radically different from those who pursue victims face-to-face.
Victims surveyed by ECHO (Electronic Communication Harassment Observation), at Bedford University, England, reported that their harassers were more likely to be a complete stranger or a casual acquaintance than a former partner.
Another major finding was that nearly 40 percent of cyberstalking victims are men. Past studies have identified women as much more at risk from face-to-face stalking.
Most of the victims surveyed were aged 20 to 39, although ages ranged from 14 to 74, with teenagers reporting social networking sites as the environment in which they were most likely to be harassed.
Emma Short, psychologist and co-author of the study, launched in September last year, said the crime was not taken as seriously as it should be.
“There is a lack of understanding of the impact of this behavior. One of the biggest questions was, ‘Is there psychological harm?’ Worryingly, a third experienced this. Not just stress, but a clinical record of psychological harm,” she said.
“There have been threats to kill. They give the impression that they know where their victims live and can get at them physically. There is a lot of damage to or loss of reputation, people being compromised by false allegations,” Short said. “I spoke to a teacher who was followed through chat rooms and the net by someone claiming to have met him through a child porn site. He had a very supportive head, but it went on for several years. He never found out who or what their intention was.”
Another victim was bombarded with vivid images of violent rape. It is often unclear what the stalker aims to get out of it, other than causing “misery and distress,” she said.
The pattern of harassment is different between male and female victims, she said, with men targeted by strangers more than women. About 37 percent of men were stalked by a stranger, compared with 23 percent of women.
Only 4 percent reported being stalked by a former partner, compared with victims of face-to-face stalking, where around half are former partners, according to ECHO.
The largest category of all was that in which the perpetrator was unknown to the victim, who had no idea how they were targeted and never found the perpetrator’s identity. One in five said the offender targeted them via social networking sites and 16 percent via blogging forums. Only 4 percent came from online dating.
Short, who surveyed 250 victims though a questionnaire, said while it is clear that a third of all victims reported clinically recognized symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, men and women often reacted differently.
“For women the fear is of physical violence to themselves and then to their families or children. For men, they are afraid of damage to their reputation,” Short said.
“The population who harass online are different to the population already understood as harassers by the police and the legislators, so the risks are unclear,” she said.
ECHO is launching a Web site at beds.ac.uk/echo, which goes live today.
The British Crime Survey 2006 estimates up to 5 million people experience stalking each year, but there are no official statistics on the percentage cyberstalked.
Last week British members of parliament called for an overhaul in the laws governing such crimes, so that both stalking and cyberstalking is legally defined. The Protection from Harassment Act 1997, the law most used to deal with stalking, has not been updated since the explosion of social media, and does not include online stalking.
At the launch of a parliamentary campaign on the issue, most victims reported that they were unable to get the police to take it seriously; that police found it extremely difficult to gather evidence or lacked an understanding of how best to use the law.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.