Last Friday, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀) revealed how to improve corporate added value in a lecture at the Chinese National Association of Industry and Commerce, Taiwan (CNAIC). Chang said TSMC’s greatest innovation was that it had bought wholesale into the “smile curve” concept (this idea, proposed by Acer founder Stan Shih [施振榮], focuses on a curve that illustrates the value-adding potential of different components in the value chain, from concept and R&D at the top left via manufacturing at the center bottom to after-sales services at the top right).
In other words, TSMC focuses on the high value-added elements at the right and the left extremes of the curve as well as manufacturing at the bottom of the curve. Value-added services made up 51 percent of TSMC’s operating income last year, much higher than the 16 percent in traditional manufacturing. High value-added services mean that employees can be given better benefits.
The secret behind TSMC’s success is that it combines low value-added manufacturing at the bottom of the smile curve with constant innovation, R&D and services. This idea runs counter to the view, dominant in years past, that Taiwanese businesses need to move their low value-added manufacturing to China and focus on high value-added brand management, services, intellectual property and R&D at the two extremes of the smile curve.
On reflection, we are bound to ask how could there be R&D, innovation and brand management without basic manufacturing? TSMC has been successful because Chang understands this logic.
The government has either misunderstood the smile curve concept, or been taken in by academics who say Taiwanese businesses should move to China. This is the only way to explain why it has been complicit in encouraging the exodus to China, which has undermined Taiwanese industry and contributed to a shortage of domestic investment, slow economic growth, falling real incomes and a growing wealth gap. This has made it difficult for many people to make ends meet.
In the past, many Taiwanese businesspeople have moved to China to take advantage of China’s lower salaries. This has indeed given temporary relief from falling added value, but it has also delayed investment in innovation, R&D and industrial upgrading. This trend has been reinforced by the all-out opening up toward China adopted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government after it came to power in 2008 and the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) last year, in practice implementing a one China market.
Last year, Taiwanese investment in China reached US$12.23 billion, a 102 percent increase, while overseas Chinese investments in Taiwan fell by 20 percent to a US$3.81 billion. This is the “outstanding” fruits of government policy over the past three years. It is also a warning, telling us that the ECFA will only undermine Taiwanese industry at an even faster rate. It also speeds up the widening of the wealth gap and helps create an economic atmosphere conducive to eventual unification. If this development is not halted, the continued weakening of Taiwan’s economy will make it difficult for Taiwan not to fall behind other Asian countries.
This fate can be avoided by nurturing more companies that buy wholesale into the smile curve concept and create more added value for the country’s working people.
The question is who will be able to carry out such a policy, to benefit both country and people. This is an issue that the next government will not be able to avoid.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry