A sleepy New Jersey town has popped onto people’s radar screens because it has the oldest running nuclear power plant in the US — and, some say, the most dangerous.
Named for a Revolutionary War general, Lacey is the kind of US town that few from outside the seaside settlement knew much about before the earthquake and tsunami in Japan triggered a nuclear crisis.
Down the road from the 1950s-style diner and across from the bridge that locals use as a fishing pier stands the Oyster Creek nuclear plant.
It uses a General Electric Mark I boiling water reactor identical to those that lost power at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi plant in the March 11 earthquake and then was struck by a tsunami that knocked out its backup generators, causing reactor cooling functions to fail.
US anti-nuclear activists and many residents of Lacey and surrounding Jersey shore townships worry that a similar nuclear disaster could happen at Oyster Creek, and it wouldn’t need an earthquake or tsunami to trigger it.
Oyster Creek has been dogged by problems — including a corroding liner in the carbon steel containment unit, leaks that allow radioactive tritium to seep into drinking water and huge volumes of stocked spent fuel rods.
“We have 40 years of radiation on site — two-and-a-half to three times more than in Japan,” anti-nuclear activist Jeff Brown said.
“You also have that tremendously stupid design to start with where the spent fuel rods are sitting on top of the reactor,” he said, raising a fear among residents that the reactor could be an easy target for a terrorist attack.
“At the very least, we need a no-fly zone over Oyster Creek. We have a no-fly zone over Disney World, but not here,” said Peggi Sturmfels, a program organizer at the New Jersey Environmental Federation.
Oyster Creek is owned and operated by Exelon Corp, which employs 700 people at the plant. The company disputes the charges by activists, insisting the reactor is safe.
“Nuclear power stations in general are the most hardened and well-protected industrial facilities in existence. Oyster Creek is no exception,” Exelon spokesman Craig Nesbitt said.
Half a million people live within what would be the -evacuation zone if Oyster Creek were ever to have a radiation accident. In the summer, the population swells with beach-goers heading to the Jersey shore.
The town is 137km south of New York and 88km east of Philadelphia.
New Jersey is not in a seismically active zone, but meteorologists say the coastal state is long overdue for a Category 5 hurricane.
“One good storm surge, and Oyster Creek’s backup generators are swamped. It’s Japan all over again,” Sturmfels said.
Nesbitt rejects such assessments, saying the plant is 8km off the Atlantic coast, protected by barrier islands, and 7m above sea level, far higher than the largest recorded storm tide of 2.1m in 1962.
He also said Oyster Creek “is constantly evaluated and improved” and that more than US$1 billion has been spent on plant upgrades since operations began in 1969.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission extended Oyster Creek’s license for another 20 years in 2009.
The commission not only gives out nuclear licenses, but is the industry safety watchdog. That’s a conflict of interest, say critics who liken the situation to the regulation of the oil industry prior to last year’s devastating Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
Under pressure from state officials, Oyster Creek’s license was rolled back to 10 years, and the plant is now due to close for good in 2019.
Even that’s too late, some residents say.
“I don’t like it. They should close it sooner,” retiree Barbara Murrofsky said as she shopped at a hardware store.
“What’s happening in Japan has made us more aware of the problems we have in our own backyard,” she said. “There are so many people who live near here that an accident would be a major disaster. They should shut it down now.”
However, another local, Rick Gifford, looked philosophically at Oyster Creek.
“It’s been running for 40 years with no problem, there’s no reason it should start having problems now,” he said.
Greg Auriemma, a lawyer for the Sierra Club environmental group, said Gifford’s stance was not unusual in Lacey.
“There’s a sense of complacency because while the plant has had a lot of negative publicity, no major disaster has occurred. So people look at it and say, ‘It’s been running for 40 years, what’s the big deal?’” Auriemma said.
However, Auriemma said, as Japan showed, one tragic event can dramatically change the situation.
“There’s a potential disaster that could happen right here in our backyard,” he said.
Last week, US President Barack Obama ordered a “comprehensive review” of US nuclear safety and vowed to learn lessons from Japan’s atomic accident.
The commission on Wednesday last week launched its review of the 24 US reactors, saying a full report and recommendations would be published in six months.
A federal court hearing a case brought in 2009 by environmental groups against the commission on Monday last week asked the nuclear watchdog to advise if Japan’s unfolding crisis impacted “the propriety” of renewing Oyster Creek’s license.
On the same day, the commission extended for 20 years the license of another Mark 1 reactor, in the state of Vermont.
The Vermont Yankee reactor has had tritium leaks, a cooling tower collapse and even a fire in the plant’s transformer.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations