Keep Taiwan, Uncle Sam
Charles Glaser is a pinhead for suggesting the US consider making concessions to China, including the possibility of backing away from its commitment to Taiwan to avoid military competition with China (“Abandon Taiwan: US academic,” March 2, page 3).
If Taiwan were abandoned, Taiwanese would suffer from the US’ betrayal, they would lose their freedom and democracy and go back to an era of totalitarianism like under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) during the Martial Law era. Taiwan, known as a “beacon of democracy,” would become the first democratic country to convert to communism in the 21st century.
Internally, Taiwanese are also very much concerned that the KMT government is too “inclined toward China,” like a conspirator. If Taiwan were lost to China’s hands, the US would become a country without credibility, a paper tiger and a passe superpower in the eyes of its allies around the world.
The US strategic defense line along the Western Pacific rim would lose a vital link — Taiwan — and even the security of the US itself would be jeopardized.
Since the US owes China billions or trillions of US dollars and has been importing most commercial products from China, Glaser might as well suggest importing military supplies from China to avoid military competition. He should understand that a balance of military power is one of the means of maintaining world peace.
Japan and South Korea would be seriously victimized if Taiwan were given up by the US. Oil and liquefied natural gas supply routes to Japan and South Korea might be hindered or even blocked by China.
The resentment of Chinese against Japanese due to the Nanking Massacre during World War II still persists. Mass demonstrations in China against Japan are sometimes utilized to stabilize the Chinese government.
Be strong and uphold the Taiwan Relations Act, Uncle Sam.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
The tragedy of tragedy
It seems a tragedy in itself when it takes major injury and loss of life such as the Greater -Taichung pub fire to move government officials to enforce existing laws and create new ones.
Where have these paid public servants been hiding? Isn’t it a bit obvious that there is a difference between a beverage store and a pub?
My sincere condolences to the families of those killed and injured. We must not let this happen again.
TOM KULECK
Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with