Taiwanese universities are developing strategies to cope with an imminent crisis.
Government figures show that in 2008, 97 percent of Taiwanese who wanted to pursue higher education were accepted by Taiwanese universities. So currently, just about everybody who wants to go to university can do so. However, the population demographics of Taiwan are such that over the next 10 years the absolute number of potential university students will decrease. This gradual decrease in students will eventually lead to the closure or restructuring of some of the less popular universities.
To counterbalance this projected decrease in Taiwanese student numbers, many universities are attempting to comply with ministerial objectives to internationalize universities by intensifying their efforts to attract international students to fill the soon to be vacant seats in the lecture theaters.
University recruiting delegations head off in droves to countries with Chinese-speaking communities such as Indonesia and Malaysia, and ultimately China, to attend education fairs designed to win the heads, hearts and purses of foreign students with stories of the dynamic international education to be gained from study at Taiwanese universities.
However, is this the best strategy for Taiwanese universities to pursue en mass?
Is this even a remotely sensible strategy for rural universities to be investing in?
Let us be realistic and put national pride temporarily to one side; we can bring it back into the equation a little further along. Do Taiwanese universities deliver a world class education that would attract international students? Only four Taiwanese universities are ranked in the top 200 in the world. Therefore, it is likely that the majority of the 78 Taiwanese universities are not going to see many of the academically motivated international students.
Are Taiwanese academic qualifications accredited in other countries? No, not without extensive retesting.
Will these recruiting efforts convince non-Mandarin-speaking students to attend Taiwanese universities? No, only a few universities have courses taught in English and many universities don’t offer Mandarin language training courses.
When I question the Taiwanese students that attend the university where I teach, undergraduates tell me they came to this university because they were rejected by their first choice of university and because the tuition fees are cheap. After this, we have reasons like the air is good and the scenery pretty. So, if upper-mid-ranking rural Taiwanese universities are not the first choice of Taiwanese students, is it a credible strategy for the administration of these same universities to focus on recruiting foreign students to make up some of the anticipated enrollment shortfall?
Perhaps rural universities should not be focusing on providing more of the same education. Perhaps they need to re-invigorate the education they provide so that Taiwanese students will want to attend because the education that is provided has world-class value.
Sadly, education is no longer valued for itself, but has become a commodity. So, in this vein of logic, ask yourself what does Taiwan have access to that the economies of the world crave? Like it or not, the answer is simple — cultural and geographic proximity to Chinese-speaking China. For a short period of time, Taiwan has the potential to become a conduit for Western economies and scholarship to access China. However, if Taiwanese rural universities are to effectively exploit this opportunity they need to develop a truly bilingual English-Chinese hybrid education.
Presently, the English-language abilities of many Taiwanese students is grossly inadequate. This is not a reflection of the intellect of the students, but shows that past pedagogical strategies were inadequate. Temporally, there is no critical window for the acquisition of a second language. Morphologically, the human brain remains plastic and capable of learning almost indefinitely. Learning any language, be it first, second or third, is primarily about need and immersion.
Taiwanese rural universities need to couple vision with real commitment and spend a bit of time and money on developing their intellectual infrastructure so that the education they provide will evolve to meet the needs and opportunities of the future, rather than trying to extend the lifetime of the existing, often uninspiring, educational strategies. To strengthen the linguistic basis of the existing university curriculum a draconian change is required.
One possibility is that rural universities would offer a one-year diploma for English language that would be a prerequisite for enrollment in all university degree courses or could be used as a stand-alone certificate by those who do not intend to pursue a university degree.
All students would be required to master a credible level of English before being allowed to enroll in specialist university lectures that will also be taught in English. Lecturers, currently encouraged to teach in English, would have the satisfaction of teaching to students who are competent in English and know that the content of their lectures could be comprehended.
At graduation from university these students would be bilingual and professionally educated. This educational content would be of far greater international value than the Taiwan-centric, nominally international variety that is currently being offered. Once the hybrid bilingual system is established, opportunities beyond those originally anticipated will certainly develop.
So why have some university administrations chosen to recruit foreign students to fill seats and forsaken the opportunity to develop an educational experience that would meet the needs of Taiwanese students and in so doing lift their universities out of the educational doldrums in which they currently languish?
Peter G. Osborne is a guest professor of neuroscience in National DongHua University’s Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this