The newly elected mayors of Taiwan’s five special municipalities were sworn into office last Saturday. Now that they have taken up their posts, they face enormous debts adding up to about NT$500 billion (US$17.4 billion). Worse, some of the cities may find that the funds allocated to them by the central government are much less than they expected. That means that they will have to go back to the old pattern of asking the central government for subsidies and taking out further loans just to get by. This state of affairs clearly runs contrary to one of the original ideas behind upgrading cities and counties to special municipalities, which was to enhance local governance and improve the cities’ global competitiveness.
Following the municipal mergers and upgrades, the most important task is to enhance the fiscal autonomy of the special municipalities, so as to make local governance a reality.
Taiwan’s existing system of local autonomy was broadly laid out 60 years ago, but it was never put into practice because of the influence of an authoritarian system that prevailed for a long time. The central government never granted financial autonomy to the localities. In fact, when the Taiwan Provincial Government was downsized, its revenue from business tax and other local taxes was turned over to the central government, making local governments even less autonomous financially than they were before, and putting local governance even further out of reach.
According to figures for last year compiled by the National Treasury Agency (國庫署), apart from Taipei City, whose independent sources of revenue covered 78 percent of its annual expenditure, the average figure for other cities and counties in Taiwan was only about 47 percent. Even for Kaohsiung City, which was already a special municipality before the recent upgrades, the figure was only about 50 percent. In fact, 15 cities and counties did not even have sufficient independent revenue to pay their own personnel.
The root cause of this problem is the paternalistic authoritarian mindset emanating from the central government. By keeping local governments dependent on handouts of “expenses” earmarked for specific purposes, in the form of general subsidies and project-based subsidies, the government seeks to keep control over what local governments are doing. The central government sees the localities as children who will never grow up, so it won’t allow them to have fiscal autonomy. When the central government has such an authoritarian attitude, it’s no surprise local governance never gets off the drawing board.
Following the upgrades, the powers and responsibilities of special municipality mayors have grown, as have their expenditures. This calls for a total makeover of the existing practice of providing subsidies for specific purposes, so as to give local governments real fiscal autonomy and make the idea of local governance a reality. If the central government really wants to give the country a boost, the first thing it needs to do is make Taiwan’s cities more competitive, and the starting point for that is to increase their financial autonomy. The best way to achieve this would be to increase the overall amount of funds allocated to local governments by the central government, and to allocate them according to an established formula, while at the same time cutting down on general subsidies or abolishing them altogether. General subsidies leave too much room for uncertainty and do not help cities to improve their global competitiveness in the long run. On the contrary, reliance on subsidies puts cities in fear of being marginalized year after year, and runs contrary to the original core purpose of upgrading to five special municipalities.
Kevin Chang is research coordinator with the Taiwan Brain Trust.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China