Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) recently paid his third visit to Taiwan. During his first visit in November 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government sealed off the Grand Hotel with several layers of barricades as if Taipei was still under martial law, and police injured several protestors in the riots that ensued.
As Chen returned to the Grand Hotel on this occasion, the government mobilized 2,000 police officers for his security and to ensure the success of the sixth round of cross-strait talks between him and Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤). The mobilization of such a contingent of police makes one wonder what major issues were discussed.
The two sides signed an agreement on medical and health cooperation, something most Taiwanese probably do not consider deserving of such a major police mobilization.
Most people do not object to the fact that dialogue and cooperation are replacing missiles and cross-strait hostility. However, the premise for such talks is sincerity as reflected in the honest implementation of agreements. If no agreements are signed, there would be no expectations, but the selective implementation of signed agreements can easily lead to feelings of being duped, which breeds unnecessary conflict rather than improved relations.
Despite the fact that the two sides have signed 14 agreements over the past two years, implementation has been flawed as they mostly exist in name only. Even the foundation admits that there is room for improvement. Why, then, did it not spend more time fixing these flaws and subject agreements under discussion to stricter reviews?
The agreement on medical and health cooperation for example, covers four areas: infectious disease prevention, the safe management, research, and development of drugs, the safe management, research, and development of Chinese herbal medicine and emergency treatment. All of these are important, and should be discussed. For example, about 90 percent of herbal medicine on the Taiwan market is imported from China at a total value of more than NT$10 billion (US$333 million).
This indicates that we are all but certain to be prescribed herbal medicine from China when we go to a traditional pharmacy. Since herbal medicine involves both medical treatment and nourishment of the body, most people consume it. That being so, it is important to ensure that the seller guarantees the ingredients are in no way toxic as a result of heavy metal pollution, pesticide residue and that its weight is not increased through the addition of lead or saline or any other products where their essence has already been extracted.
Everybody knows that signing the agreements is not really the problem. Rather, the problem is whether they will be effectively implemented.
This involves two things: Taiwan’s negotiating skills and Chinese implementation. In terms of the former, Department of Health Minister Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) recently said the government plans to adopt source management measures to control herbal medicine imported from China and send officials directly to the place of origin to conduct inspections. However, that statement was immediately challenged by the chairman of the department’s own Committee on Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Huang Lin-huang (黃林煌), who said no country has such great power that it can inspect factories in exporting countries and that Taiwan can only demand that China supply “export inspection certificates” that meet Taiwanese standards.
Given that the agreement has already been signed, how should herbal medicine be safely managed? Why should China take it seriously when the department in charge of the talks appear unsure of itself? How should they gain the public’s trust?
To get to the root of the safety and quality of Chinese herbal medicine, Taiwan must obtain China’s permission to inspect places of origin. Otherwise, even if China supplies “export inspection certificates,” we have to ask if such certificates are meaningful given the flawed Chinese management mechanisms and poorly educated Chinese farmers. Even then, how effective would greatly enhanced domestic inspection be?
In other words, the signing of the agreement was useless because it will not improve the current situation and it could even mislead the public into believing that such products are reliable, as they become less alert. That is a matter of great importance.
In terms of negotiation skills, apart from the ability to grasp the nature of problems, it is also important to be able to avoid conflicts of interest, but the government once again held closed-door negotiations with China on this agreement. Some Chinese herbal medicine associations complained that the government did not ask for the industry’s advice beforehand, so not even the industry knew what was being discussed. This approach means that the text may not be well thought through as decisions are made by a small coterie of people.
More seriously, Taiwanese businesspeople wonder whether the notorious term “Chinese characteristics” will mean that vested interests with good connections in Beijing will monopolize production and marketing channels, and in the end sources and prices. There is reason for these doubts and the government must face up to them honestly — yet another major issue that deserves attention.
The Ma administration treated Chen — who has been described as a “Q-list” politician by Chinese dissident Wang Dan (王丹) — as its most honored guest and sent 2,000 police to protect him. If the government invited him to Taiwan in order to sign a meaningless agreement or an agreement that at best serves vested interests, just like the previous 14 cross-strait agreements, then wasn’t it treating the public as fools by signing the 15th agreement?
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.