In order to eliminate the problem of schoolyard bullying, Vice Premier Sean Chen has announced the establishment of an interdepartmental anti-bullying platform that will implement a plan to prevent such incidents, while Minister of Education Wu Ching-ji (吳清基) has pledged that he will treat schoolyard bullying in the same way as SARS and aims to mobilize the entire nation.
The Ministry of Education has also broached the idea of letting the police onto school campuses and military instructors back into junior high schools.
These schoolyard “bad elements” are young people, not even 16 years old, who for various reasons have developed deviant behavior. They bully and hurt their fellow students, and are guilty of many other wrongdoings.
However, schools are not military barracks, nor are they police stations; they are educational institutions and it is part of their duties to educate these young people that government officials perceive to be bad elements.
The current wave of reports about school bullying has angered the general public and caused a cascade of complaints. In response, all that the government’s educational bureaucrats can come up with is to let police onto school campuses and military instructors back into junior high schools.
It is clear that in the minds of education ministry officials, the police and military instructors are more capable of solving the bullying problem and are better positioned to educate these bad elements.
This makes one wonder why we need an education ministry. How can the minister of education even think that he can simply pass his troubles on to the police and the military?
What it comes down to is that bullying is an educational problem and the ministry cannot pass this problem on to the military, police or the judicial system.
We cannot give up on any child and the ministry should propose an effective educational solution instead of trying to come up with programs to deal with criminals.
Also, the Cabinet should not just put on a show with a “platform” that only aims to gloss over things to placate the public, but accomplishes nothing.
What is even worse is that they now want to let large numbers of police and military into school grounds.
Educational problems should be solved with educational means. The education ministry has no idea how it should deal with the bullying problem and the main reason is the attitude of the ministry’s officials.
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to realize that junior high school students are emotionally unstable. We cannot only focus on knowledge and learning, we also have to focus on personal development.
To be able to care for the personal development of junior high school students, schools need sufficient psychological counselors and social workers.
My personal experience of junior high school students in the US shows that there is one psychological counselor for approximately every 200 students.
If the education ministry doesn’t want to face up to the fact that there is a major shortage of psychological counselors and social workers at our schools, they mights as well set up an anti-terrorist department and install permanent anti-crime and anti-terrorist teams at every school and be done with it.
Allen Houng is a professor at National Yang-Ming University’s Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under