It looks like the Grinch really has stolen Christmas — no, not today — but the many Christmases to come. The recently inked cross-strait medical and health cooperation pact will ensure this.
The accord provides for the exchange of information and cooperation in fighting infectious diseases, cracking down on counterfeit medicines and products, ensuring drug safety and establishing cooperation in clinical trials. The Department of Health said the pact would bring standards and norms for medical products on both sides of the Taiwan Strait into line with each other. For example, Chinese exporters of herbal medicines will have to produce certification on the safety of their products, safety checks must meet international standards and products will undergo three rounds of inspection. It sounds too good to be true, because it is.
To say that a pact dealing with public health was seen as easier to ink than one on investment protection, which had been scheduled to be signed this week as well, is mind-boggling would be an understatement. That more time was needed to ensure the safety of Taiwanese corporations and businesspeople, but not the health of the 23 million people of this nation, is truly sickening.
Of course, the investment pact has all those niggling details about business rights, treatment of investors, expropriation of property, compensation, dispute settlement and so on. Taiwanese businesspeople can get pretty heated about those — as can politicians, who have their own investments in China, or those of close relatives, to worry about.
It is so much easier to reach an accord on medical matters when you know the other side will just lie anyway. Why worry about frank disclosure with a government that has prevaricated, stonewalled and covered up one medical nightmare after another — the spread of AIDS through unhygienic blood collection and transfusions, SARS, harvesting of organs from executed prisoners, contamination of milk powder and other products, swine flu, etc, etc, etc.
Why not ask doctors Gao Yaojie (高耀潔) and Jiang Yanyong (蔣彥永) about what it’s like to “work with” Beijing in trying to fight the spread of infectious disease, or Zhao Lianhai (趙連海) about campaigning for product safety?
The 84-year-old Gao was persecuted and finally driven from China for raising attention about and treating villagers infected with HIV through contaminated blood transfusions and blood donation procedures. Jiang, the army surgeon who blew the lid off Beijing’s SARS cover-up in 2003, was first hailed as a hero and then reviled when he tried to draw attention to other issues. Zhao was sentenced last month to two-and-a-half years in jail for establishing a Web site, “Kidney Stone Babies,” for parents of children who became ill after consuming melamine-contaminated milk powder. He was found guilty of “inciting social disorder” after his initial arrest in December last year on a charge of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.”
Yes, Taiwan’s government has just signed an agreement with a regime that has proven time and again that it is willing to sacrifice hundreds and thousands of its own people to ensure its continued rule. So while the freshly inked pact talks about raising medical and drug standards on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, it’s hard to see how Taiwan’s standards have anywhere to go but down.
Unlike Dr Seuss’ tale, there’s unlikely to be any change of heart in the Presidential Office or Zhongnanhai that would see the Grinches returning what they have stolen from the Whos as they slept. In real life, the Whos must wake up and prepare to fight to retain their rights and protections — through the ballot box, through protests and by refusing to accept a fait accompli.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry