President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) takes his work seriously, but unfortunately that seriousness has led to many strange things.
As a negative result of Ma’s battle for power in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the party disregarded Taiwanese history. Later, he set about finding a group of “academics” with an interest in Taiwanese history who would develop a new theory to show that Taiwan belongs to the Republic of China (ROC).
He could not get academics who support independence, and the KMT’s own academics don’t have a clue about Taiwanese history. Instead, he found people such as former Academia Historica president Lin Man-houng (林滿紅), a formally trained historian and National Taiwan University philosophy professor Wang Hsiao-po (王曉波), who has no training as a historian.
Regardless of their training, their approach to the study of history is too strange for words. For example, Lin has always believed that the Treaty of Taipei between the ROC and Japan can prove that Taiwan belongs to the ROC as well as establish Taiwan’s international legal status.
However, this implies that apart from Lin, nobody else in the world — neither academics nor governments — has heard of this document or if they have, they do not understand it. This must be the case, for otherwise, how could people refuse to recognize the ROC in the face of such a powerful document? That would mean that not one country in the world is international law properly understood.
Under Lin, the Academia Historica arranged an online poll to find the greatest figures in the 100 years of the ROC — and came up with a list that included Chinese Communist Party leaders Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平). While it is not surprising that Lin would do something to connect Ma’s Taiwan with China, the KMT still has to deal with the 2012 presidential elections and this is why Lin had to resign after an uproar erupted over the listing of Mao and Deng.
As for Wang, who has managed to get on the commission that oversees the compilation of history textbooks, his mission is to “re-sinicize” Taiwanese history teaching materials.
How should this be done? Not long ago, one controversial project involved proving that Taiwan has belonged to China since ancient times by tracing the relationship back to the Three Kingdoms period when China sent troops to Taiwan. This idea created a backlash among trained historians in Taiwan. Even Ge Jianxiong (葛劍雄), a Chinese authority on China’s historical geography and a full-on unification supporter, ridiculed this claim in his work Unification and Division: The Enlightenment of Chinese History.
“Sun Quan’s [(孫權), founder and emperor of Eastern Wu, one of the three kingdoms] dispatch of soldiers to Taiwan was a stupid attempt to take captives and plunder people,” Ge wrote.
Real historians call this a stupid thing, but the new school of historians employed by the KMT view it as the best thing that ever happened, because it provides a basis for linking Taiwan to China. This is a somniloquy induced by dreams of dominance, not history.
The new “history curriculum” has made historians shake their heads in disbelief, but this is only the tip of the iceberg. It is not a bad thing that Ma knows that the KMT’s understanding of Taiwanese history leaves a lot to be desired, but finding unorthodox historians to come up with whatever he wants just invites ridicule.
The Academia Historica’s online poll has been pulled, but the creation of new teaching materials continues. In the future, history will be taught with the aim of presenting an ideology based on false history, not disseminating knowledge.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry