Reaction to the conclusion of the UN climate change conference in Cancun, Mexico, last weekend has been almost universally downbeat.
“A slap in the face,” Friends of the Earth International said.
The Guardian’s leader column described it as “another opportunity lost.”
However, there’s a different way of looking at the deal — on emissions reduction, deforestation and financial help for developing countries — that 193 nations reached on Dec. 11. It’s to see the very fact of agreement as a crucial advance.
Climate change presents what economists call a “collective action problem.”
It can be tackled only if everyone acts together: No one country’s efforts will be enough. So if governments, businesses and individuals believe that others are not taking action, a rational response is not to do so oneself. It’s a version of the prisoner’s dilemma — it pays to co-operate, but not if others are not doing so. However, if we don’t act, we will definitely face catastrophe.
That’s what happened after the debacle of the Copenhagen conference last year. Governments and businesses looked at the failure to come to a meaningful agreement and began to withdraw their own commitments. The US, the EU and Australia started rowing back on their pledges. Businesses put clean energy investment plans on hold. Those with a vested interest in not taking action, and the climate skeptics, became emboldened, assiduously spreading further doubt.
Cancun reverses that negative momentum. Now countries have put domestic emissions reduction commitments into a formal UN agreement, further action can be justified. The really convincing political and economic case for investing in low-carbon energy is not just tackling future climate change, but generating “green growth” now.
It’s the jobs and the new clean industries that will be stimulated by a low-carbon world that countries and businesses are eyeing up eagerly. However, investing in these requires confidence that others are also cutting emissions — that there will be new low-carbon markets and that high performance will not be undercut by competition from lower-cost polluters.
After Cancun, the global race to produce clean technologies is back on. Business and investor confidence has a chance of being restored. Europe has justification for moving to its higher 30 percent emissions reduction target by 2020. The really significant shift is the willingness of emerging economies — China, India, Brazil, South Korea and others — to cut emissions growth and their refusal to allow the world to be dragged backwards by the dysfunctional politics of the US. The view now is that the US will simply have to catch up later when the economic costs of its high-carbon economy become painfully apparent.
Cancun’s critics are of course absolutely right to say that what was achieved is not enough. As the agreements themselves insist, all countries’ commitments will have to be revisited in the light of a scientific review in three years. However, let’s not miss the significance of what has been done. If the Cancun commitments are fully implemented, global emissions should peak in about 2020, and that is the essential first step toward a subsequent decline.
And it isn’t correct that Cancun’s 2020 targets mean the global temperature will inevitably breach the tolerable 2°C threshold. The level at which it will stabilize will be determined as much by what happens after 2020: Countries will have to make much greater — and more expensive — efforts, but it is not out of the range of the possible.
Climate change is a frightening phenomenon: It often feels too large and difficult, requiring too much political will, to deal with. For many, fear induces paralysis and feelings of hopelessness.
However, the world is now beginning to combat global warming and there is now a chance that this knowledge will encourage further effort. There is no room for complacency, but the real danger is that pessimism becomes self-fulfilling.
So the question about Cancun is not “Did it do enough?” — we knew the answer to that already — but “Does it make further action more or less likely?”
On that there’s no doubt.
In climate change, fatalism will prove fatal. Optimism that we can combat climate change is not just an essential psychological condition, it’s a vital political posture. Cancun gives optimism a boost: It should therefore be a reason not for continuing despair, but for hope and renewed determination to do more.
Michael Jacobs is a visiting senior fellow on climate change and the environment at the London School of Economics and a former special adviser on energy and climate to the British prime minister.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and