Having gained the world’s attention by briefly waging war on South Korean territory last month, North Korea has reverted, for now, to a more familiar tactic — a war of nerves fed by vitriolic propaganda, threats and tantrums, underpinned by a policy of studied unpredictability.
Pyongyang maintained its confrontational drumbeat this week.
Rodong Sinmun, the main party organ, declared enhanced US-South Korean military co-operation to be “nothing but treachery, escalating the tension and bringing the dark clouds of a nuclear war to hang over the Korean Peninsula.”
And Tuesday’s disclosure by South Korea that the North may have built up to four additional facilities for nuclear weapons-related uranium enrichment is unlikely to calm the febrile atmosphere. The intelligence suggests the regime is hell-bent on maximizing its nuclear capabilities, notwithstanding any future disarmament talks.
In this tense game of -diplomatic-military poker, South Korea is not even the North’s principal adversary. Kim Jong-il is now blithely defying all the major regional actors — the US, China, Russia and Japan — while actively exploiting differences between them. It makes little difference whether his aim is recognition and security guarantees; economic and financial assistance; or the succession of his son. Kim is playing off the great powers against each other to see what he can get out of them. The result is virtual diplomatic meltdown.
Just look at what has happened since last month’s bombardment of Yeonpyeong Island. China, the North’s only influential ally, has come under strong US pressure to pull its supposed client into line. China’s perceived failure to do so is straining relations with Washington. US Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg visited Beijing today carrying the message: China must do more, fast.
Resentful of such criticism, but simultaneously alarmed at the North’s unruly behavior (which it says it cannot ultimately control), China sent a top envoy, State Councilor Dai Bingguo (戴秉國), to Pyongyang last week.
In a bland statement bordering on meaninglessness, the foreign ministry claimed today the visit achieved consensus: “The two sides believe that parties should keep calm and exercise restraint, take a responsible attitude to avoid further escalation of tensions and play a constructive role in safeguarding peace and stability on the peninsula.”
China insists a resumption of the six-party talks on North Korea’s nuclear program is the best way forward. Pyongyang would probably support this if the negotiations, broken off last year, restarted without preconditions. The US, Japan and South Korea, on the other hand, oppose rewarding Kim’s “bad behavior,” and are demanding a range of prior assurances. So the impasse persists — and the North has no incentive to change its ways.
Russia, a party to the talks, is hardly doing any better. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told his North Korean counterpart, Pak Ui-chun, yesterday that Moscow was deeply concerned by recent events.
Last month’s attack “deserves condemnation,” he said.
But then Lavrov grew placatory, agreeing that US-South Korean military exercises were inflaming tensions, a view shared by China.
For his part, Pak, unfazed by this mild reprimand, told the Russian news agency Interfax that the “hostile and confrontational policy” of the US and South Korea justified “strengthening our defense potential with a focus on nuclear deterrent forces.”
Evidently worried by the North’s defiant insouciance, Russia announced on Tuesday it had raised the alert status of its forces in the country’s far east.
“Without a doubt, we have taken measures to increase the combat-readiness of our forces,” a military spokesman said, adding the army was “continuing to monitor” the situation.
Differences of approach are also evident between Japan and South Korea, suspicious old enemies yet to be fully united in a common cause. In South Korea itself, the fallout from last month’s attack has been damaging, prompting financial market jitters, the resignation of the army chief and the defense minister, and severe criticism of South Korean President Lee Myung-bak. If the North’s aim was to sow confusion, it has succeeded — and not only in Seoul.
Two things seem clear from all of this: First, that the various parties to this crisis need to form a united front if they are to have any chance of inducing the North to behave more responsibly. Second, that at present they are incapable of doing so.
Maybe it’s time for a fresh approach. New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, an experienced freelance mediator who specialized in rogue regimes under former US president Bill Clinton, arrived in Pyongyang on Thursday. In his time, Richardson has dealt face-to-face with the likes of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, Slobodan Milosevic, Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir and the North Koreans. Perhaps he will have more luck than the diplomats in bringing order to chaos.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry