The recent special municipality elections marked the first time that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) received a greater share of the overall vote than the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in a local election.
The elections also signaled a big change in the structure of the KMT’s support at both the national and local level. Although the KMT has always held an overall lead over the DPP, that lead was always higher the more local the elections were.
During the 1990s, the KMT generally won about 55 percent of the vote in county commissioner and mayoral elections, regardless of whether the elections took place in northern or southern Taiwan. In the direct municipality councilor elections, the KMT’s proportion of the vote increased to 60 percent, in county and city councilor elections it rose to 70 percent, while in borough and village chief elections the party received 80 percent of the vote.
In comparison, the DPP won less than 10 percent of borough and village chief seats, a number that increased gradually through the city and county councilor elections up to the direct municipality councilor elections, reaching about a third of all seats in the legislative elections and more than 40 percent of the county commissioner and mayoral seats during the 1990s. Then, finally, the party won more than 50 percent of the vote in the 2004 presidential election.
The DPP’s voter support structure is the result of restrictions implemented by the authoritarian KMT government. Under the authoritarian system, various grassroots organizations, political or not, and including local governments, civil servants, farmers’ or fishermen’s associations, labor unions and regular non-governmental organizations, were all strictly controlled by the KMT. In the KMT’s corporatist state, class contradictions were not very intense and the DPP found it difficult to develop at the grassroots level. The fundamental significance of the system of martial law that developed was that it prevented Taiwanese from participating in central government.
As the government treated society as its polar opposite, it is only natural that society was opposed to the state on such clearly national issues as martial law, the permanent legislature, the ban on new political parties and newspapers, and cultural discrimination.
Before democratization, an opposition movement called dangwai — “outside the party” — formed and members of this movement always received a higher proportion of both the vote and the number of seats in legislative by-elections, provincial councilor elections and county commissioner and mayoral elections than in county and city councilor elections, or, in particular, in township chief elections. The more local the election, the stronger the KMT’s monopoly.
Following democratization and the resulting social changes, the KMT’s ability to control the grassroots and various non-governmental organizations was drastically weakened and the recent elections were an almost total reversal at several levels.
In addition to the two parties’ even strength in the direct municipality mayoral elections, they also drew even in the county and city councilor elections, where they received a third each of the vote and 130 seats each. As for the most local of all elections, the borough and village chief elections, the KMT has in the past won 80 percent of the seats, but this time it didn’t even get a third.
It is also worth noting that the Taiwan Solidarity Union, the New Party and the People First Party were defeated across the board in terms of borough and village chiefs. However, the KMT’s loss did not mean that the DPP’s share of the seats increased significantly.
Summing up these observations, we see some structural changes in Taiwan’s political landscape.
First, the trend toward a two-party system is becoming increasingly clear. While this is partly the result of the legislature adopting the Japanese single-member district, dual-vote electoral system, it is also the result of strong Chinese pressure, both positive and negative, which has been so strong that Taiwan’s main domestic conflict suppresses all other issues. While a two-party system can be a positive thing, it also makes it difficult for a diversity of new progressive issues to make their way into the public focus.
Second, there is more room for independent candidates in the city councilor elections than in the mayoral elections. This is dependent on the fact that one of these elections is for a single seat, while the other is for a large number of seats. However, that leaves us with the question why the number of independents is increasing so quickly among borough and village chiefs, which also are single seat elections.
This situation highlights the development toward a focus on political parties in higher level elections, while the focus is turning away from political parties at the grassroots level. This is beneficial both to the consolidation of a shared community feeling in smaller communities and to the formation of party and policy competition at the national level.
Third, at the same time as the normalization of democratic politics is continuing, we can also see the weakening of factors that have traditionally contributed to the formation of local forces. This is leading to a paradigmatic change in the logic behind the support distribution for political parties.
It is because of this change that the KMT still believes its fundamental support base is bigger than the DPP’s, but that view is the result of the mistaken application of the old paradigm to the new situation. It was this mistake that resulted in the KMT’s strategy to revive its deep-blue supporter base and this strategy was the reason why the party lost the overall vote in the recent elections to the DPP.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China