Among the information released by WikiLeaks recently comes the news that last year’s hacking of Google servers were initiated by the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Politburo, and that the order was given by Zhou Yongkang (周永康) and Li Changchun (李長春), both members of the Politburo Standing Committee. Back in November 2004, the Epoch Times published an article about how Internet monitoring was being used in China to persecute Falun Gong practitioners. The article mentioned Zhou by name, in his capacity as head of the Ministry of Public Security, as the orchestrator of the Internet censorship.
The Golden Shield Project, a censorship and surveillance project led entirely by the ministry, gave the Chinese authorities unprecedented surveillance powers over members of human rights and democracy movements. The news that Zhou gave orders to attack Google comes as no surprise: It is just part of his everyday job as one of the senior leaders of the CCP’s system of terror.
Zhou gained the favor of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) for cracking down hard on Falun Gong back when he was head of Sichuan Province. This earned him the appointment to head the security ministry. In this position he was quite open about the need for coming down hard on the Falun Gong, identifying it as an important task for the ministry, and was known for rewarding members of the ministry who persecuted Falun Gong practitioners. From 2001 onwards, numerous cases were brought against Zhou by the Falun Gong group in countries such as the US, Canada, Sweden and France for torture, genocide and crimes against humanity.
Li was also implicated in the attack on Google. Li is in charge of ideology and CCP propaganda. He has been criticized for “inciting hatred” by calling on people to persecute members of Falun Gong. In 2004 Li visited France. When he was there, Falun Gong brought charges of torture against him.
Here we have a situation in which CCP officials and senior cadres have been charged with serious offenses internationally, but the government in Taiwan has turned a blind eye to such things. They have been given information about these officials’ involvement in human rights abuses by civil human rights organizations, but they have chosen to ignore it. The Ministry of Justice even went so far as to designate the secretariat or deputy secretary of the CCP’s Central Committee — essentially the leaders of their most senior spy group — as “legal experts” and allowed them to visit Taiwan. This is totally absurd.
Since October, a number of local governments have passed legislation requiring the Mainland Affairs Council and the National Immigration Agency to run careful checks on Chinese officials and senior CCP cadres applying for entry into Taiwan to see if they have ever been involved in human rights abuses. Those involved in such abuses are to be considered persona non grata, and notices are to be sent to councils on every level, as well as to civic groups, asking them to refuse invitations to visit China from such individuals, and certainly not to invite them to visit Taiwan.
To date, these local governments include Kaohsiung City Council, Miaoli County Council, Changhua County and City council and Hualien County Council, and I expect that more will follow suit. Hopefully the government can listen to the public, respect Taiwan’s democracy and freedom and prevent senior members of the CCP, a regime that violates human rights, from coming and contaminating Taiwan. Their presence in this nation is an insult to Taiwanese.
Theresa Chu is a US-based human rights lawyer.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry