The ceremony on Friday night was exemplary. The chair of the Nobel judges, Thorbjorn Jagland, left the prize on the empty chair that should have been occupied by the imprisoned human rights activist Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), had the Chinese authorities allowed him — or his wife — to travel to Norway to accept it. An audience including some of the world’s most august people offered a standing ovation. There was a haunting violin recital of Chinese music.
The same could not be said of China’s behavior. It was stung into a diplomatic and propaganda campaign against the Nobel Peace Prize committee that has reached new heights of ham-fistedness. For everything China has done over this affair has been ill thought-out and self-defeating. The regime must be very fearful indeed about the potential of the society on which it has been sitting for years to erupt — and the surprisingly lively pro-democracy movement to go viral — for it to mobilize against one solitary activist to such an extent. What we have witnessed is not the strength of a new great power in the making as today’s China is commonly understood — but profound and psychotic weakness. China’s anti-peace prize campaign is born of deep apprehension of its own vulnerability and lack of legitimacy.
China improbably claimed that the award was to a criminal, and thus mocked the Chinese legal system that had convicted him to 11 years’ imprisonment. It campaigned to persuade countries not to attend the ceremony, with the implicit promise of reward for those who conformed and penalties for those who did not. Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Russia duly obliged. It has cracked down on its domestic dissidents with even more force and paranoia than usual. And it launched its own rival Confucius peace prize as a symbol of Asian values and priorities.
This was meant to reinforce the idea that there was now a new global center of economic and cultural power anchored in non-Western values based in Asia in general and China in particular. But the Confucius peace prize was a complete fiasco. It was awarded to a Beijing stooge, former Taiwanese vice president Lien Chan (連戰). He then did not turn up to accept it, so the organizers turned to the trusty notion of asking a garishly lipsticked six-year-old girl to accept the prize in his stead as symbol of innocence. What had been designed as a celebration of Confucianism ended up highlighting its embedded flaws. Today, in its name, the Chinese state can set up an alternative peace prize and award the alleged honor to whom it pleases in a completely opaque process. If this represents Asian values, the world should shiver.
The party has a long record of opportunistically exploiting Confucianism to shore up its appeal. Liu Shaoqi (劉少奇), in the 1940s one of the five-strong leadership group around Mao Zedong (毛澤東), argued that the essence of becoming an effective communist was the same as becoming a good Confucian — inner steel, self-criticism and self-discipline. Yet even while he wrote, the same party could damn Confucianism for trapping China in hidebound pre-modern traditions, corruption and suffocating poverty. Today that criticism is forgotten. The party now needs Confucianism too much to dare to be critical.
Part of the overreaction to Liu Xiaobo is that the party leadership knows that regime change in the Confucian Imperial era always came through revolt from below — and that when Liu Xiaobo dismisses Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) as leader of “the communist mafia” he combines effective and highly personal attacks on the new communist mandarinate with principled adherence to human rights and constitutional democracy. This was the position of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), who toppled the Qing dynasty in 1911, appealing to universal values. The danger is obvious.
If the strains in the economy were less acute, the party could be more relaxed. But China escaped the full force of the world recession only by resorting to a reckless credit-driven expansion; state-owned banks have near doubled their lending in just three years. As a result, today’s Chinese banking system has trillions of dollars of non-performing debts that make the US and UK banking system in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis look positively sound. The world economy cannot absorb the volume of Chinese exports; there is not the demand. The gravely unbalanced Chinese economy is a bubble about to pop. It needs root and branch reform — reforms that go to the very foundations of communist rule.
But without economic growth the regime has no prop on which to rely; if it cannot provide jobs and the prospect of prosperity, its only rationale is that it alone can hold the vast country together. This is no longer a party that can plausibly argue it is the custodian of a communist revolution; nor is it a party legitimized by the ballot box. It was the conjuncture of economic difficulties, notably inflation, and legitimacy that ignited Tiananmen in 1989 — and many senior officials, including the likely next Chinese president Xi Jinping’s (習近平) father, were very sympathetic to the protesters’ demands because one way or another China had to find its way to legitimate government. For 20 years the arguments have been put on ice.
Xi Jinping is the leading candidate of the fifth generation of China’s leaders to succeed Hu; but it was the fifth generation of leaders in the Soviet Union who found that the lack of legitimacy, five generations after the revolution, plus endemic economic problems were unmanageable.
The conservatives in the party do not know whether to trust Xi Jinping; he could be, given his father’s views, China’s Mikhail Gorbachev — ready to bust open the Chinese political system. And Liu Xiaobo could be China’s Andrei Sakharov — the Russian human rights activist given the Nobel peace prize in 1975 just before the fifth generation of Soviet leaders took over, but only to disband the Soviet Union because there was no other way forward.
Xi Jinping cannot take the succession, which could yet be very bloody, for granted. This is how to understand the mobilization by the world’s second-biggest economic power against one human rights activist. The big political actors in China have not spoken out, leaving the statements and explanations to minor foreign office spokespeople. They want to keep their powder dry for bigger battles.
It is lonely arguing that China is in deep economic and political trouble. But what has happened over Liu Xiaobo suggests that there are some in agreement — the men at the top of the Chinese Communist Party.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs