According to recent overseas news reports, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has declared himself intent on continuing the process of de-Stalinization. He has said on several occasions that although Josef Stalin made contributions, the crimes he committed against his own people should not be forgiven. Medvedev’s opinion is clearly at variance with that of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who served 17 years in the KGB. Russian society’s divided historical memories of the former Soviet ruler can seem rather familiar to us in Taiwan.
Stalin’s Great Purge, which claimed several million victims, is regarded by historians as one of history’s darkest periods. Nevertheless, in many people’s minds Stalin was a national hero who defended the Soviet Union against invasion by Nazi Germany and who governed the country in a very effective way. This year, as Russia solemnly celebrates the 65th anniversary of victory in World War II, the question of Stalin’s contributions and failings has once again become a focus of discussion.
The Moscow city government reportedly planned to include Stalin’s name and photographs in exhibitions and street decorations connected with the anniversary. The Russian Communist Party and other left-wing groups warmly welcomed this idea, encouraging people to think of Stalin as a founding father, thinker and patriot.
Human rights groups, on the other hand, strongly opposed the idea, saying that displaying posters that included Stalin’s portrait would be disrespectful to the victims of his despotic regime. The organizers responded that their intention was not to make propaganda on Stalin’s behalf, but simply to display historical photographs. They said that the international community recognized the Soviet people as the victors, while Stalin was the nation’s leader at the time. They pointed out that some of the photos were of Stalin meeting with then US president Franklin Roosevelt and then British prime minister Winston Churchill at the Tehran and Yalta conferences, and that surely Stalin could not be deleted from such pictures.
The question of how to evaluate Stalin has long been a thorny issue in Russia. In a television poll conducted this year to choose historical heroes, Stalin got the third highest number of votes, and history books that seek to rationalize his oppression continue to be published.
Last year Medvedev warned the public not to exaggerate Stalin’s achievements. He urged people to always remember the millions of Soviet people who suffered and died under Stalin’s rule, and criticized efforts to absolve the despotic regime of its responsibility.
As Medvedev put it, “Even now we can hear voices saying that those numerous deaths were justified by some supreme goals of the state. I am convinced that no development of a country, no success or ambitions can be achieved through human grief and losses.”
Medvedev also expressed -concern that as many as 90 percent of young people could not name one famous people who suffered or died as a result of political repression.
Further steps planned by Medvedev may include fully declassifying the regime’s archives, increasing the compensation paid to victims, tracking down victim’s burial sites, building more museums and memorials, and possibly even enacting laws forbidding the whitewashing of dictators.
Taiwan, too, was subject to authoritarian rule during the Martial Law Era. Compared to Russia, Taiwan has done better in terms of declassifying documents and compensating victims, but when it comes to divided historical memories about Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the situation in Taiwan is strangely similar to that in Russia.
We in Taiwan are justifiably proud of our democratic achievements, but regrettably the governments of both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have displayed a reluctance to dispel antagonism between their supporters and made little effort to heal the wounds of the past.
On the one hand, the former DPP government was accused of clumsiness in its efforts at “de-Chiangization.” On the other, after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) led the KMT back to power, his government lost no time in putting back plaques and signs bearing the words “Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall,” which the DPP administration had for a while replaced with -“Democracy -Memorial Hall.” It has also continued to use state resources to commemorate the former authoritarian leaders.
Recently a dispute erupted over ownership of the diaries of the two Chiangs. Surprisingly, Commonwealth Publishing Co, which enjoys a good reputation, plans to publish the diaries of the elder Chiang under the title The Diaries of the Honorable Chiang (蔣公日記), choosing a feudal honorific, rather than The Diaries of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石日記), using his name in a neutral fashion, which is what Academia Sinica calls the diaries.
In addition, a descendant of the Chiangs has designed a range of memorabilia related to the two former dictators that includes pendants in the form of silver and gold-colored bullets. The idea behind this “creative” design may have something to do with the fact that much of Chiang Kai-shek’s life was devoted to military affairs, but for family members of people executed during the White Terror Era it is likely to have an altogether different meaning. Such an insensitive decision could easily reopen old wounds, but so far we have seen no public discussion of this matter, much less criticism.
In theory, Taiwan has traveled a lot further down the road of democratization than Russia, but when we compare the way the two societies have gone about handling the remnants of authoritarian rule, there is much less difference than one might imagine.
Yeh Hung-ling is executive secretary of the Taiwan Association for Truth and Reconciliation.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry