Since the 1980s, countries in East Asia have been in the grip of a “baby race” to reverse the declining birthrate. Taiwan entered this “race” in the early 1990s, but even today its approach has been unique. Unlike Japan, Singapore and South Korea, Taiwan has been cautious and half-hearted. Should Taiwan commit more revenue, resources and national spirit to this race to increase fertility?
Taiwan’s current total fertility rate (TFR) of 1.08 last year was an historical low. The TFR is an annual calculation of the number of children a woman is likely to have during her childbearing years. The replacement fertility level is 2.1 children — the number of children required to replace the existing population and prevent population decline.
It should be remembered, however, that many countries both large and small have a TFR between 1.1 and 1.5, including South Korea, Japan, Singapore, Germany and Italy — even the People’s Republic of China currently stands at 1.5, according to the US Census Bureau.
Policies to reverse Taiwan’s low fertility rate compete with other equally important views in society — for example that Taiwan is overpopulated. Many policymakers are also not convinced that low fertility warrants significant expenditure. This is partly because the link between rising fertility and economic growth is not well established. Also, for older generations, Taiwan’s demographic revolution is still fresh in their minds. The successful reduction of high fertility to low fertility through family planning is one of the great success stories in the post-war world.
The reduction of fertility from very high levels to replacement level in order to avoid economic and social chaos was the most pressing issue for Taiwan in the 1950s and 1960s. Taiwan suffered from severe overpopulation, with a TFR of 7.04 in 1951. Family planning was essential to reduce fertility.
The Taichung Study in the early 1960s found that women actually wanted to have fewer children. The need for contraception and resources for reproductive health were central to the work of the Institute of Family Planning, which oversaw “Taiwan’s demographic miracle.” It was an incredible and unique accomplishment. This work should not be forgotten.
Taiwan’s efforts to raise fertility began in 1992 with the promotion of earlier marriage and encouraging the birth of two children. Despite these efforts, by 2005 the TFR was 1.12. A 2008 white paper was another step toward a Taiwanese model for demographic renewal.
The most recent idea has been this year’s search for a slogan to increase fertility with a prize of NT$1 million (US$33,000). Slogans haven’t worked elsewhere in East Asia and are unlikely to have much of an impact on Taiwanese families, except to cause embarrassment and unnecessary social pressure. Policies to increase fertility are fraught with difficulties and have a poor record — virtually all have failed.
Demographic renewal is a difficult path for all countries, therefore caution is warranted. The essential question is: What kind of society do Taiwanese want for their children? The first choice is to pressure young women through slogans, incentives or social embarrassment to marry younger and have more children. The second choice is to invest time and money in all stages of life and develop social and economic policies that will strengthen the entire nation. This second choice requires difficult choices, but in the end will deliver a stronger and more dynamic Taiwan.
Michael Sutton is a Northeast Asian visiting fellow at the East-West Center in Washington.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China