Blind justice or vengeance?
I’m told that many pan-blue supporters these days feel quite comfortable stating out loud that former first lady Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍) should be made to serve out her sentence in a prison hospital, lest she be “unfairly” treated better than she truly deserves.
Of course, she should be given the same treatment as other felons of similar guilt and medical need, but it appears many members of society won’t feel satisfied unless Wu is punished to the absolute utmost — without, of course, crossing that hazy line into the realm of torture.
It is plain to see the spirit at play here is cold vengeance. Much of the public has been held enchanted in a vengeful frenzy for several years now, ever since accusations of malfeasance against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) first emerged in the early years of his administration.
These feelings peaked after the “bulletgate” re-election when “Chen as Fuhrer of the Third Reich” effigies were paraded “peacefully” around the city center. I think it is fair to say those weeks of black T-shirts (and later, red T-shirts) were an example of mass hysteria.
I talked to people at the time. They just “knew” Chen was guilty of some kind of “dirty tricks.” There was no need for proof or a trial. It was “obvious,” people would tell me.
Then came the long, slogging next four years, with accusation after accusation being hurled at Chen, the pan-blue believers convinced of each until the next one came along. Eventually bits started to stick and the pan-blue believers can rejoice now because the judiciary agrees (usually) that the “shameless” former first couple profited by illegal means to the tune of US$20 million through a shady land deal in Longtan (龍潭) and an influence--peddling scheme that at least one of the two must have been aware of.
Of course, it really isn’t so hard for most people to imagine a president of Taiwan or his wife being somewhat corrupt. You know what they say about power, but back to the vengeance. Are Chen and Wu really being punished to a standard typical of similar white-collar criminals here in Taiwan? How will we ever intensify the punishment a hundredfold when, if ever, former China Rebar Group chairman Wang You-theng (王又曾) is repatriated to serve time for stealing US$2.3 billion from hundreds of identifiable victims?
And I want to ask the pan-blue believers who hope that Wu — herself a victim crippled by a brutal murder attempt that was likely political — dies in a grim prison hospital: How do they feel so certain their own political heroes are untainted by any crimes equal to or worse than Chen and Wu’s? Who among Taiwan’s formerly powerful can easily account for all of their personal wealth?
It is easy to see why Chen’s loyal supporters feel enraged. Justice simply does not appear to be blind in Taiwan.
Xindian, Taipei County
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement