Blind justice or vengeance?
I’m told that many pan-blue supporters these days feel quite comfortable stating out loud that former first lady Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍) should be made to serve out her sentence in a prison hospital, lest she be “unfairly” treated better than she truly deserves.
Of course, she should be given the same treatment as other felons of similar guilt and medical need, but it appears many members of society won’t feel satisfied unless Wu is punished to the absolute utmost — without, of course, crossing that hazy line into the realm of torture.
It is plain to see the spirit at play here is cold vengeance. Much of the public has been held enchanted in a vengeful frenzy for several years now, ever since accusations of malfeasance against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) first emerged in the early years of his administration.
These feelings peaked after the “bulletgate” re-election when “Chen as Fuhrer of the Third Reich” effigies were paraded “peacefully” around the city center. I think it is fair to say those weeks of black T-shirts (and later, red T-shirts) were an example of mass hysteria.
I talked to people at the time. They just “knew” Chen was guilty of some kind of “dirty tricks.” There was no need for proof or a trial. It was “obvious,” people would tell me.
Then came the long, slogging next four years, with accusation after accusation being hurled at Chen, the pan-blue believers convinced of each until the next one came along. Eventually bits started to stick and the pan-blue believers can rejoice now because the judiciary agrees (usually) that the “shameless” former first couple profited by illegal means to the tune of US$20 million through a shady land deal in Longtan (龍潭) and an influence--peddling scheme that at least one of the two must have been aware of.
Of course, it really isn’t so hard for most people to imagine a president of Taiwan or his wife being somewhat corrupt. You know what they say about power, but back to the vengeance. Are Chen and Wu really being punished to a standard typical of similar white-collar criminals here in Taiwan? How will we ever intensify the punishment a hundredfold when, if ever, former China Rebar Group chairman Wang You-theng (王又曾) is repatriated to serve time for stealing US$2.3 billion from hundreds of identifiable victims?
And I want to ask the pan-blue believers who hope that Wu — herself a victim crippled by a brutal murder attempt that was likely political — dies in a grim prison hospital: How do they feel so certain their own political heroes are untainted by any crimes equal to or worse than Chen and Wu’s? Who among Taiwan’s formerly powerful can easily account for all of their personal wealth?
It is easy to see why Chen’s loyal supporters feel enraged. Justice simply does not appear to be blind in Taiwan.
PETER DEARMAN
Xindian, Taipei County
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with