During a visit by Harvard professor Joseph Nye Jr, cofounder of the neoliberal school of thought in international relations, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said cross-strait relations were improving because of Beijing’s “soft power,” while Nye suggested that Taiwan was using “smart power” — a combination of soft and military power — to maintain its security. However, both the renowned professor and the president seemed to miss one critical point: As Taiwan buddies up with China, Taiwan’s soft power is increasingly being tarnished by the association.
Beijing is undoubtedly an economic force to be reckoned with. Many countries look to Beijing to acquire manufactured goods and they want to maintain good relations to tap into that vast market. Taiwan is no exception and benefits from its status as a neighbor with a similar culture to China. However, economic power does not translate into soft power.
Under the Ma administration, Taiwan, in its sprint to cement economic ties with Beijing, has acted against some of the values underpinning a soft power strategy that the nation has used with great effect for years, most notably support for human rights, freedom of expression and democracy. The government seems afraid to demonstrate its core values on the international stage — it was unwilling to invite Uighur activist Rebiya Kadeer to Taiwan to attend a screening of the film The 10 Conditions of Love, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs at one point labeling her associates as terrorists; Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama was snubbed instead of being invited with open arms as in the past; Ma’s speeches on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre were toned down, while after Chinese activist Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) was named as the Nobel Peace Prize winner, Ma’s exhortation that China “solve major human rights incidents with honesty and confidence” was disappointingly — if not embarrassingly — tame.
Silence on China’s human rights abuses is not the only point where the government is departing from the foundations of Taiwan’s soft power. Taiwan’s stand for democracy and the rule of law has served it well, too. However, elements of these have been hollowed out as evidenced by what appears to be the government’s outright refusal to allow a referendum on the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, the curious timing of the final verdicts in former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) cases right before municipality elections and the fact that some in the government spoke so strenuously against the not-guilty verdicts, raising the question whether the executive branch had influenced the judiciary’s guilty verdicts.
While the foundations of Taiwan’s soft power erode, China’s hard power looms over its soft power. Chinese Communist Party officials appear to think economics trump everything and that they can do whatever they want because the world relies on China’s factories and access to its market. Meanwhile, which countries in the world, besides Myanmar and North Korea, want to emulate China’s political system? China has become synonymous with repression no matter how many Confucius Institutes it builds or Confucius Peace Prizes it awards and Taiwan does itself no favors by proclaiming itself a friend of such a regime.
Taiwan is slowly becoming more vulnerable as it buddies up with China, allowing many of its core values to be muddied by close relations with one of the world’s worst human rights offenders. Smart power relies on an adequate balance of soft and military power. Taiwan’s military power is already well below that of China, while the contamination of the sources of its soft power poses risks to the nation’s ties with the one country that stands as its military benefactor — the US.
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement