The shot fired at Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Committee member Sean Lien (連勝文) at a campaign rally has once again tarnished the image of democracy and elections in Taiwan, casting reason aside and eroding the dignity of Taiwanese. People were just beginning to forgive and forget after the March 19, 2004, shooting of then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his vice president, Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), when the shot fired at Lien on Nov. 26 once more stirred up resentment and enmity. That evening added another black mark to Taiwan’s history, bringing gloom and despondency to all. How long will it be until Taiwan can finally be free of such tragedies?
The shot fired that night brought fear in its wake, as could be seen in the solemn faces all around. At the same time, many people set about pondering on the shooting and trying to figure out what effect it might have had on the votes cast for the contending parties. What a sad day for Taiwan. Is that all a human life is worth? Is there no more to life in this country than political drama? Is nothing else important?
Besides the serious injury caused to Lien as the bullet tore through his face, an innocent bystander was also hit and killed. The bullet pierced Taiwan’s very heart and highlighted its tragic past and present. Confrontation is still with us. When will it ever go away? This gunshot may well have dire and unpredictable consequences that will remain with us for a long time.
What can we learn from this election? Frankly speaking, its negative aspects outweigh the positive. There were many bad examples of politicians stirring up trouble, sharpening the confrontation between supporters of the pan-blue and pan-green camps and creating a hostile division in which neither side could tolerate the other.
Will this be Taiwan’s fate forever? Are we really willing to be dragged down to such depths? I live here and I certainly don’t have the confidence to tell the world about Taiwan and its elections. The gulf between the two sides has become so deep that it seems impossible to bridge. Who is responsible for this tragic outcome? Without doubt, neither governing nor opposition parties can deny their responsibility; still less do they have any grounds for blaming their rivals. The election is over and the votes have been counted, but the bullet fired that evening has burned a deep wound in people’s hearts. How can we now stand before the world and claim that Taiwan is a model of democracy?
One election is over and done with, but the next will follow before very long. Politicians of both camps — government and opposition — must look beyond the goal of holding on to or gaining control of political power. They must without delay take responsibility for the vulgar language and violence that undermine moral values and social order and come up with a remedy that will fully remove these ills. If not, the next insult or violent act may have unimaginable consequences.
People have had enough of such irrational and unjustifiable violence that creates discord in Taiwan and ruins its reputation. The public must boldly tell politicians that we want to see reason, security and harmony in our lives, and we want a competent, capable and conscientious government. More than that, we want an environment of tolerance in which everyone can compete on an even playing field. These demands are quite fundamental, but we must ask those in authority — what have you done to make them a reality? Is it really too much to ask?
When elections draw to a close, inevitably some will be pleased with the result and others disappointed. Although the shot fired that night may make us ashamed and fearful, we cannot just go on wallowing in an atmosphere of tragedy. We should not give up our insistence on reason and moderation, truth and justice.
It is time to say no to vulgar insults and thuggery and to let the Taiwanese virtues of honesty, tolerance and tenacity come to the fore. We demand of all those in authority that they ensure a secure and stable environment for Taiwan and all the people who live and work here. This is what the public ardently desires. Let us ask of those who have been newly elected, as well as those already in office: Can you pledge to do these things and will you hold true to your promises?
Li Hua-chiu is a researcher with the National Policy Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry