By now, it is clear that a magic bullet called out Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) sympathizers to vote. The voter turnout and the election results clearly indicate its effect. Even the perpetrator knew he was going to make a huge headline with the public attack of Sean Lien (連勝文) on the eve of the elections.
Reportedly, the 9mm handgun he used is a Swiss military weapon, very powerful in terms of short-distance penetration. The suspected perpetrator tried hard to contact Chen Hung-yuan’s (陳鴻源) campaign director, climbed onto the stage, grabbed the victim’s head and apparently pulled the trigger with only minimum damage to show for it. That outcome was certainly one in a million.
If the alleged perpetrator had fired from a couple of meters away, nobody knows how Lien’s “luck” would have played out.
Also, if an incident like this were to happen in the US, there would be a press conference from the hospital and the police department within a couple of hours. The information does not belong exclusively to the government, hospital or victim’s family. The voters and democracy are victims, too. They are entitled to know the truth.
Obviously, the lack of transparency and precise information caused a lot of speculation and the government seems to have stayed with this trend, triying to gauge the response of the public and play down the incident.
No matter, this was a plot with huge political implications. The government and both parties have to address and investigate the issue and come back with a complete report for the public to peruse. Democracy has been severely tarnished and Taiwan will be reduced to the role of banana republic if gangsters are alllowed to openly shoot political figures on stage, while the mastermind gets away.
Meeting people’s needs
I would like to respond to Bruno Walther’s letter (Letter, Nov. 26, page 8) regarding my article “Placing facts back in Suhua debate” (Nov. 19, page 8).
Politicians in the areas that would be affected by improvements to the Suhua Highway have only presented two simple choices — to go ahead with construction or not. Under such circumstances, it is easy to understand why people living in those areas seem to prefer construction.
Be that as it may, most people living in those areas would probably still only use the highway once or twice a year. Comparing this low level of usage with the exceedingly high cost of construction, it impossible not to conclude that it is not a rational choice.
If it were possible to lay out alternative options that would require the same spending or less, such as increasing the frequency of trains running between Suao and Hualien or extending the short-haul road network, these may be of greater practical benefit to local people.
In that case, those people would not necessarily continue to support the Suhua Highway improvement construction project.
When it comes to choices about major construction projects, what would really be of benefit to the public would be for politicians to be more flexible and show greater consideration for what people really want and need.
Affected by the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have implemented disease prevention measures such as city lockdowns, factory closures, travel restrictions and border controls. These resulted in slowing economic activitiy and dwindling global trade, which have negatively affected Taiwan’s export-reliant economy. Consequently, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) last week revised downward its economic growth forecast for Taiwan for the second time this year. The DGBAS on Thursday predicted the nation’s GDP would expand 1.67 percent this year. The agency’s new forecast is lower than the 2.37 percent it estimated in February, and weaker than Taiwan’s economic
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a