With the rise of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), rapid economic integration between China and Taiwan and the increased interaction between people from both sides, it seems that Taiwan’s future is destined to be influenced by China to an increasing extent.
The considerable differences between the respective political systems in the two countries, Beijing’s intransigent refusal to accept the way of life the Taiwanese have chosen, the lack of mutual trust and the fact that we have long lived under the threat of war, have made it difficult to be sure of our own national security or prospects for sustained development.
The pro-Taiwan faction in this country advocates that the whole nation should come together to protect Taiwan’s sovereignty, independence, constitutional democracy, freedoms and human rights. In addition, we further want to present these things as an example to China, to encourage it to move toward a more civilized and modern society, and in this way promote peaceful development across the Taiwan Strait.
It is also important that we cultivate a wider awareness that Taiwan’s sovereignty, independence and democratic freedoms are based on respecting the right of individuals to make their own democratic choices. This will help us stem the expansionist ambitions of the PRC and promote civilized values for people throughout the world; it will also give strength to elements within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) keen to drag their party into the modern world.
Ultimately, this offers the last hope for the democratization of China and represents the historic duty of all people who crave for a free China.
In our dialogue with China, the pro-Taiwan faction must be compassionate and recognize that many people involved in such discussions may not have a good understanding of the situation in Taiwan. We need to bring empathy and patience to discussions, but also courage, so that we can stand up and protect the fundamental values that led to the establishment of a democratic Taiwan.
We desperately need to see constructive dialogue replace confrontational dogma across the Strait.
In Taiwan, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is the major pro-Taiwan, pro--localization force, but it is currently in opposition. If the DPP wants to take the reins of power a second time it must represent the interests of the Taiwanese and make the necessary preparations. It also needs to find a way to cooperate with the progressive forces within China, embracing them as strategic partners and allies of Taiwanese constitutional democracy.
The DPP’s China policy needs a completely new framework, one that places people at its center and fosters exchange and awareness between the people on either side of the Strait, on the basic precondition of peaceful advancement and respect for each other’s autonomy.
It also needs to encourage the Chinese communists to adopt the rule of law, effect political reform and promote Chinese people’s support for Taiwan. Respect and sincerity are the keys to persuading others.
DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) latest proposal, to establish a think tank charged with researching the best way to hold a cross-strait dialogue, is a first step in her party’s new approach to China and something that former DPP chairman Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) regrettably failed to achieve during his tenure. We remain optimistic and hopeful that this will now happen.
Tseng Chien-yuan is a convener in the law and politics department of the Northern Taiwan Society.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs