Taiwan has fought long and hard to achieve the democratic rights and civil liberties it now enjoys. That’s what makes it so disturbing to see individuals’ rights violated, whether by the state or by private citizens.
Many questions have been raised in the past week over the election-eve shooting of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Committee member Sean Lien (連勝文) at a campaign rally in Taipei County, both about the shooting itself and the extent of his injuries. There has been a growing clamor for his hospital records to be released publicly because of the reported speed of his recovery — and because of comparisons made to the shootings of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) just before the 2004 presidential election.
While National Taiwan University Hospital has given copies of Lien’s records to Taipei County investigators as part of the probe into the shooting, it has refused to release them to the public. The hospital said it could not make public the records of patients in cases that are under judicial investigation, adding that neither Lien nor his family had authorized the release of his records.
All the hospital needed to say was that Lien had not authorized the release. Period. That is his right, just as it is the right of every person in this country. Details of his injuries and treatment may eventually be made public as part of the prosecution of his alleged attacker, but until then only he can decide who should be informed.
Just think of the uproar last month when it turned out that low-level functionaries had disregarded the instructions of draftees about the handling of their exemption notices by sending the notices to their family homes because the men in question had HIV or AIDS.
Nor should we forget the media circus in 2004 (and ever since) over the Chen-Lu shootings — with all levels of medical staff coming out of the woodwork to comment on the veracity of the pair’s injuries or to deny them — or the fuss in 2005 when 12 physicians, led by then-legislator Peter Lin (林進興) of the Democratic Progressive Party, took it upon themselves to release what they claimed were the medical records of Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強). Hu, a KMT member, was running for re-election and had suffered a minor stroke while on a trip to California. Lin said the papers had been mailed to him anonymously.
While Taichung prosecutors later determined that the records were genuine and had come from -Taichung Veterans General Hospital, none of the 12 were prosecuted because none had actually treated Hu and no link was found between them and hospital staff. No one was ever prosecuted over the leak, although all 12 doctors were reprimanded by medical authorities and Lin, a physician, lost his license to practice for a year.
People were outraged that doctors were willing to disregard their professional ethics so easily and yet some of these same people are now demanding exactly that. Perhaps we have become too jaded by the all too frequent sight of TV cameras and photographers following hapless accident victims into emergency rooms under the pretext that any and all such intrusions are warranted by freedom of the press or “the public’s right to know.”
The public has the right to demand a full and fair investigation into the Lien shooting. It can call on Lien to authorize the release of his medical records. However, it cannot demand that the hospital or others release such data.
The right to privacy may be a relatively new concept to Taiwan, but it is a vital right that must be rigorously protected. Those who seek to infringe upon that right should be condemned, regardless of their position or motivation.
China took advantage of the vacuum left behind when US carriers stayed out of the western Pacific Ocean due to COVID-19 outbreaks on several US Navy warships. The Chinese government is solidifying its hold on artificial islands in the South China Sea by moving in missiles and surveillance equipment, and formalizing its occupation by creating two municipal districts in the region under Hainan Island’s Sansha — Xisha District on Woody Island (Yongxing Island, 永興島) to administer the Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島) and Nansha District on Fiery Cross Reef (Yongshu Reef, 永暑島) to administer the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島) —
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) yesterday wrapped up its annual party conference-cum-national decision-making forums in Beijing: the National People’s Congress (NPC) and National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), known colloquially as the “two meetings.” They are normally tightly choreographed affairs, designed to project an image of stability and unassailable strength, but several events leading up this month’s sessions provided strong indications that all is not well in the state of Denmark. The first sign of major discontent came in March, at the height of the COVID-19 crisis in China, when an article by real-estate tycoon Ren Zhiqiang
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a