The government is bracing for a media storm once WikiLeaks releases the 4,000 or so diplomatic cables it says it has that relate to Taiwan. The sheer number of documents sent between the US Department of State and the American Institute in Taiwan — WikiLeaks declared that the value of the cables relating to Taiwan outranked those from Moscow and Beijing — testifies to how deep relations between the US and Taiwan still are.
WikiLeaks has yet to reveal any surprising diplomatic cables regarding cross-strait relations. So far, we’ve seen that China continues to strenuously object to US arms sales to Taiwan, something that comes as no surprise given Beijing’s knee-jerk reaction every time the US sells anything from screwdrivers to radar systems to the Taiwanese military. Nor was it surprising when a Chinese official said Taiwan’s participation as an observer in last year’s World Health Assembly, the WHO’s decision-making body, came about because of the principle of “one China, very broadly interpreted.” Of course Beijing would only allow Taiwan into international organizations under the “one China” principle. That’s what they’ve been saying openly for years.
However, that’s just the tip of the iceberg. The government is showing how seriously it is taking the potential fallout of the leaks by appointing Deputy Minister of National Defense Andrew Yang (楊念祖) to spearhead a team tasked with following the leaks and analyzing and verifying any details related to Taiwan. Although Minister of National Defense Kao Hua-chu (高華柱) downplayed the accuracy of the documents, saying not all of them were “necessarily true,” his appointment of Yang casts doubt on his sincerity.
WikiLeaks has already revealed a number of surprising diplomatic twists with its latest batch of released cables. For instance, who would have guessed that China was so ready to accept a reunified Korea under a government based in Seoul? It’s obvious from the cables that China’s leadership is fed up with the brinkmanship of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il, especially because the one thing Beijing craves is stability to give it time to develop its economy and military. Former Chinese deputy foreign minister He Yafei (何亞飛) was even quoted as saying that Pyongyang was acting like a “spoiled child.” The cables also reveal that China has much less influence over the North than previously thought.
With revelations of that magnitude out of the Korean Peninsula, what can be expected regarding Taiwan? Already, there is much speculation that the cables will cover political assessments of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and other political, diplomatic and military leaders, as well as economic forecasts for the nation. Might they also contain a candid US assessment of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) or US military assessments of Taiwan’s chances in a cross-strait conflict?
Of the cables so far released relating to Taiwan, probably the most important is the one detailing a private meeting between US officials and former Singaporean prime minister Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀), in which Lee says China is using economic means to force reunification with Taiwan. Lee describes Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) as a pragmatic man who doesn’t mind waiting 10 to 30 years for economic ties to cement Taiwan in a Chinese bear hug.
This candid appraisal from Singapore’s founding father seems strikingly similar to what Taiwan’s opposition has been saying ever since the ECFA was first promulgated, and the complete opposite of the rosy appraisal the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government has been giving the cross-strait trade pact.
And this is only the beginning.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs