The world economy is in a super-cycle. This is a period of historically high global growth, lasting a generation or more. There are many factors driving this, including rising trade, high rates of investment, rapid urbanization and technological innovation. Super-cycles are also characterized by the emergence of economies enjoying rapid growth, such as China, India and Indonesia now.
The world economy has twice enjoyed super-cycles before. The first, from 1870 to 1913, saw a significant pick-up in global growth, with the world growing on average each year by 2.7 percent, a full 1 percent higher than previously seen. That cycle was led by the emergence of the US and saw increased trade and greater use of technologies from the Industrial Revolution. The second super-cycle, from 1945 to the early 1970s, saw growth averaging 5 -percent and was characterized by the post-World War II reconstruction and catch-up across large parts of the globe. It saw the emergence both of a large middle-class in the West and of exporting nations across Asia, led by Japan.
We may now be in another super-cycle, with aspects similar to those seen in the first two super-cycles.
For people in Asia and across the emerging world, the idea of strong growth may not sound unusual. However, for many in the West, the thought of a super-cycle may sound strange, given the present problems confronting the world economy.
Yet, the reality is the world economy now is more than US$62 trillion, about twice the size it was a decade ago and it has already exceeded its pre-recession peak. Over the past two years, its rebound has been driven by policy stimulus in the West and by -stronger growth in the East. Indeed, emerging economies, which are one-third of the world economy, currently account for two-thirds of its growth. This trend looks set to continue.
By 2030, the world economy could grow to US$308 trillion. Excluding inflation that would equate to US$129 trillion in real terms, or in today’s prices, and to US$143 trillion, keeping prices constant, but allowing for some emerging-market currency appreciation.
The projections would imply a real growth rate of 3.5 percent for the period between 2000, when the super-cycle started, and 2030, or 3.9 percent from now to 2030. That would be a significant step-up compared with 2.8 percent between 1973 and 2000.
What is remarkable is not only the likely scale of this expansion, but the fact that these forecasts are based on projections for growth that some might even think are too cautious. For instance, China is expected to grow on average 6.9 percent per year over the period to 2030 and India by 9.3 percent. By 2030, India may have become the world’s third largest economy. Moreover, Indonesia, currently the 28th largest economy, may have moved to the fifth largest in twenty years, having enjoyed nearly 7 percent average growth over that period.
There are always risks that could impact global growth. The first super-cycle ended with the outbreak of World War I and the second with the oil shocks of the early 1970s. Hopefully, the world today is better placed to address such risks thanks to the emergence of international decision-making bodies and policy fora such as the G20.
It is important to stress that a super-cycle does not mean that growth will be continuously strong over the whole period. For the past three or four years, I have been pessimistic about US growth and I am still cautious. Despite the benefits of quantitative easing, the US economy will still struggle in the year-ahead, growing below trend. Likewise, Europe and Japan face a sluggish near-term outlook where growth will be modest.
All this makes it even more remarkable if Asia can drive more of its own growth. That is, after all, what the world needs. Next year, China sees the first year of its 12th five-year plan. That should help growth. However, even allowing for this, the Chinese and other central banks across Asia will be tightening policy to cap inflation. In turn, this should allow growth to be more sustainable, but at rates either close to, or even below, those seen this year. So, even in a super-cycle, there can be challenges for policymakers.
Just as it is important to focus on near-term challenges, it is also vital to keep sight of longer-term opportunities. During the super-cycle, we believe that China can displace the US as the world’s largest economy by 2020, far sooner than many expect.
While such forecasts give a scale of the outlook, it is the story behind what is happening that is as important.
There is the scale of the economies that are growing. As emerging economies grow they will exert greater influence on the world economy. Then there is the impact from the growth of new trade corridors. Close to 85 percent of the world’s population are becoming increasingly inter-connected through trade, allowing an unprecedented number of people to contribute to the global economy.
Cash and financial resources will be critical drivers of growth, given the need for investment, particularly in infrastructure. Then there is what I call perspiration, with more people working and spending, and inspiration, with greater use of innovation and technology.
The countries that will succeed will be those with the cash, the commodities and the creativity. In recent years, I have described what was happening as the New World Order, reflecting a shift in the balance of economic and financial power from the West to the East. While still valid, a super-cycle better reflects what is happening. It is still possible for the West to do well in this environment, particularly if economies there are creative. Yet, it is Asia that appears to be the clear winner.
Gerard Lyons is group head of global research and chief economist at Standard Chartered Bank.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under