After former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was found not guilty on Nov. 5 of charges of accepting bribes related to the second wave of financial reform, the issue of corruption has once again become a focus of attention.
Less than a week later, Chen was found guilty of bribery in a final verdict on the Longtan land acquisition case. Both cases show that Taiwan must deal decisively with corruption. While everyone has been focused on corruption involving the former first family, an important aspect is being overlooked: If businesses did not offer bribes, politicians would have one less place to look to for illegal profits.
Businesses play various roles in corruption. At times they may be the perpetrators of a crime as they bribe civil servants to further the company’s interests, encouraging civil servants to breach their duties to benefit business. For example, the political contributions that surfaced during the second wave of financial reform were given so that these companies would benefit from the influence of publicly-owned firms.
At times like this, businesses become accomplices in the broad sense of the term. Sometimes, however, they become the victims of corruption. There have, for example, been cases in which companies have had to give out “contributions” against their will after being blackmailed by corrupt politicians. Other companies operate on the fringes of the law, such as when a financial holding company allegedly gave a cash wedding gift of NT$6 million (US$195,900) to Chen’s son, Chen Chih-chung (陳致中).
Shareholders entrust managers to run their company in accordance with the law. Financial holding companies are not only responsible to their shareholders, they also control the savings of the public, which means they have a wide scope of responsibility. However, too little attention has been given to business corruption. Although government agencies have started to study business-related corruption over the last two years, we have yet to see any concrete legislation or integrated action.
If a company gives money to government agencies, it follows that they will not hesitate in taking money in private. A culture of corruption is not something that forms overnight. We should also think about who pays the bribes. Does the chairman or chief executive of the company cover the cost? If the company absorbs the cost, how is the expenditure accounted for? With bribes often reaching millions or billions of NT dollars, how could they not affect the finances of a business?
If the money does not show up in financial reports, we need to ask if these companies are falsifying their accounts. In such a case, shouldn’t the financial and accounting staff of the companies be held responsible? Haven’t the companies’ legal departments set up mechanisms for handling self-discipline and risk management?
When company officials bribe the government, they hurt the interests of their company and place it at risk. This is clearly a breach of trust.
To stem corruption, Taiwan should implement reforms immediately involving the following.
First, businesses should ask themselves three questions: Do we have any anti-corruption policies or guidelines? Have we implemented these policies or guidelines? Are these policies or guidelines attaining their expected goals?
The government should encourage businesses that are successful in implementing anti-corruption policies. For example, this can be done by offering tax benefits to such companies or by giving them preferential treatment when choosing contractors. If a business becomes involved in corruption, but can show that it has anti-corruption policies in place and that it has done what it can to prevent corruption, courts could perhaps consider giving special consideration when issuing a sentence. These methods would all be intended to increase the willingness of businesses to fight corruption.
Second, the government should consider emulating Hong Kong’s Prevention of Bribery Ordinance (防止賄賂條例) and directly listing corruption in the private sector as a crime. It should also look at US federal criminal law, which has regulations against illegal contributions, as well as US laws on bribery conducted overseas. The government should also take bribery committed overseas and extend it to make it applicable to “being induced to execute or fail to execute any act in violation of the official duties” as mentioned in the current Anti-Corruption Statute (貪汙治罪條例).
In addition, if a business actively engages in bribery, apart from being investigated and having a case brought against it, the firm should be banned from bidding for and working on government projects, as this would stop a company from hoping it might get lucky and gain larger, illegal profits by giving out small amounts of money.
Third, the government should quickly establish a law to protect whistleblowers and help prevent blackmail of businesses to protect and strengthen the resolve of the corporate world to expose corrupt practices.
Fourth, anti-corruption awareness among investors should be promoted so they understand that while a business should work to maximize profit, it should also fulfill its social responsibilities. Corrupt companies violate the rules of fair competition and cause social damage. Investors should abandon such irresponsible companies.
We cannot create a clean government and society overnight. Only by getting the public and private sectors and civil society to work together, bringing together self-regulation and the regulation of others, can Taiwan stop being seen as a “nation of corruption.”
Carol Lin is an assistant professor at National Chiao Tung University’s Graduate Institute of Technology Law and a former lawyer.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry