Last Saturday, the eighth Taiwan Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride parade took place in downtown Taipei. I was touched by the enthusiasm of the more than 30,000 homosexuals and their friends marching in the rain. I also saw my students from the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at National Tsing Hua University holding banners with so much joy on their young faces. As their teacher, I was truly happy for them. When compared with the crowd of 500 who covered their faces at the first parade eight years ago, the event this year was real evidence of Taiwan’s democratic development.
In recent decades, the protection of human rights for homosexuals has gradually become a focus of attention in the US and other democratic nations in the West. Although there is still much controversy, the overall trend is toward recognizing and approving gay rights. Since Western democracies face numerous social problems, why do they still pay so much attention to this particular issue?
Simply put, the issue of gay rights does not only affect the rights of gay people, it involves the development of the entire democratic system. One could even say that a democratic society that fails to protect gay rights is not a mature democracy. There are at least two reasons to support this statement.
First, democracy is not only about freedom of expression or the transition of government power. Above all, it is a way of living, and a concept. In other words a lifestyle choice, and changing concepts are the most important element of democracy. Looking back at the history of civilization, shifts in ideas have almost always predated any systemic adjustment. It is in this sense that fundamental concepts such as tolerance of and respect for the rights of minorities make up the foundation of the democratic system. Any democracy in which these basic ideals fail to be realized is immature and risks regressing.
As a minority group in Taiwan, the question of whether homosexuals are accepted and respected by mainstream society is a direct test of the depth and consolidation of democracy in that society. If those politically disadvantaged people who constantly pursue democracy refuse to protect the rights of homosexuals, they are selfish hypocrites simply fighting for their own democratic rights, and not for the democratization of society as a whole.
A key component of democratic development lies in eliminating specious views of certain ideas. Examples of such views are the idea that democracy will lead to chaos, or that people with a lower educational or cultural background are unable to exercise their democratic rights. Such concepts are the biggest enemy of democracy.
The issue of gay rights is plagued by more specious views than many other issues. For example, some claim that homosexuality is an obstacle to human civilization. Homosexuality was very common during the ancient Greek era, but was suppressed in the Middle Ages, so which era was more civilized?
Others claim that the existence of homosexuals could endanger human reproduction. However, the gay movement did not rise until about six decades ago. During this period, which country has suffered a decrease in birth rates due to the gay movement? The world population has already surpassed the 6 billion mark. One reason to support the gay movement is that we need to oppose such wrong thinking and must not let such concepts become the basis for policymaking.
This is precisely the reason why increasing numbers of heterosexual groups and individuals in the West support the gay community. They are aware that the question of whether gay rights can be fully protected has implications for democracy in general. That means the issue affects everyone, including heterosexual people and their rights. Taiwan must not avoid the issue of gay rights if it wants to further consolidate its democracy.
Wang Dan is a visiting assistant professor in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at National Tsing Hua University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under