The Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ rudeness toward former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe during his two-day trip to Taiwan demonstrates just how partisan government bodies have become under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration.
The ministry claims that it respected the opinions and wishes of the Japanese entourage while it was here, but then why did officials seek to obstruct any meeting between Abe and the opposition, while being more than happy to arrange a meeting between Abe and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on the first day of his visit?
The meeting was something of a flop, with Ma unwilling to touch on the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) issue after saying last week that he didn’t oppose China’s claim over the islands because China is still Republic of China (ROC) territory under the Constitution. Amid the bitter dispute between Tokyo and Beijing over the islets, that interpretation was no doubt at the top of the list of points Abe wanted to bring up with Ma. It was rude of Ma to ignore the issue.
However, that was not the main reason foreign ministry officials snubbed Abe. The main reason was that Abe did not only want to meet with the KMT.
He did end up meeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who was much more willing to discuss and defend Taiwan’s claim to the Diaoyutais, adding that Taiwan needed to engage with Japan, not China, in bilateral talks on the thorny issue.
This no doubt irked the KMT, whose chairman was either too spineless or too pro-Chinese to bring up the issue and therefore ministry officials did what they could to hamper further meetings between Abe and DPP members.
Before meeting Tsai, officials had put pressure on Abe not to meet her. Tsai claims that Abe’s entourage had to call the DPP directly to arrange the meeting because the ministry refused to coordinate schedules.
Ministry officials said Abe never told them he wanted to “meet with [chairpersons] of any specific political party,” but Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), the DPP’s director of international affairs, says the ministry had told Abe that the DPP was “too caught up in election affairs.” This implies that Abe had expressed an interest in meeting Tsai, but that the ministry sought to obstruct it.
That shows a complete lack of respect for a former head of state.
In another recent example of partisan politics on the part of an appointed official, Council for Hakka Affairs Deputy Minister Liu Tung-lung (劉東隆) expressed outright support for KMT Sinbei City mayoral candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) at a campaign event, clearly violating the Civil Service Administrative Neutrality Act (公務人員行政中立法).
However, while Council for Hakka Affairs Minister Huang Yu-cheng (黃玉振) admitted that this was improper, he said all that he would do would be to watch Liu more closely, slapping his wrist merely figuratively.
Liu even had the temerity to say that an appointed official had “an obligation to endorse the ruling party’s policies and candidates.”
What does this all show?
It shows that the KMT sees no separation between government and party. It is an authoritarian regime that does not grasp the concept of government neutrality.
Liu, as well as the rest of the KMT and the officials they have appointed, whether it be at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Judicial Yuan, prosecutors’ offices or overseas diplomatic posts, see the KMT and the government as one. The problem is, not all Taiwanese or foreigners share that view.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry