Discussion of the US-Russia Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty — aka New START — has so far pretty much skipped one very important consideration: China.
In the run-up to last week’s Senate committee vote to send the treaty to the floor for ratification this fall, senators quite rightly debated whether New START overly restrains US missile-defense options, has weak verification procedures, cuts too many US missiles or warheads or might affect nuclear North Korea and near-nuclear Iran.
However, lawmakers haven’t yet fully faced the problem that, as we build down our strategic nuclear forces in the White House’s hopes that others will disarm, China is involved in a strategic buildup. So, before there’s any final vote, it’d be wise to give some thought to Beijing’s burgeoning bevy of bombs.
While the exact shape of China’s grand ambitions may not be clear, there’s little question they exist. Few would dispute that Beijing wouldn’t mind taking the head seat at the table of global powers, now occupied by Washington. As such, China has been growing all aspects of its national power. This is not limited to a break-neck conventional buildup; its strategic forces are booming, too.
China long relied on a small, land-based nuclear force of ICBMs in fixed silos and on a limited number of road-mobile missiles, providing for a “sufficient and effective” deterrence in Beijing’s eyes. However, the force has started getting bigger, better and badder. While the US strategic arsenal desperately needs updating, Chinese nuclear forces are being modernized.
And China’s warhead numbers are up, by some estimates even doubling in recent years. The Pentagon says Beijing may now be able to put multiple nukes on a single, newly developed, road-mobile missile.
Indeed, if any country can undertake a so-called “rush to parity” with the US and Russia, it’s China, especially considering its aspirations, wealth and willingness to lavish largesse on its armed forces. Basically, Beijing could become a nuclear peer competitor of Washington and Moscow in the not too distant future, in light of the expected arms cuts under New START.
It doesn’t end there. China’s 2nd Artillery (nuclear forces) is reportedly building 4,800km-plus of tunnels in central China, likely providing Beijing with an enhanced, land-based, second-strike capability. Naturally, China’s ICBMs are thought to be targeted at the US.
Beijing is also diversifying its nuclear capabilities by broadening its force structure into the traditional triad — missiles based not just on land but also on bombers and subs. China’s new class of strategic submarine may already carry its first sea-based ICBMs. And Beijing’s building another “boomer” sub class, too, significantly raising its nuclear-strike mobility and survivability — while lowering detectability.
It’s also adding advanced strategic bombers to the mix. Analysts believe China is developing long-range cruise missiles for these aircraft, which may have both conventional and nuclear warheads.
Making matters more complex is China’s highly secretive stance on its nuclear forces. The People’s Liberation Army has a penchant for strategic denial and deception — and an unwillingness to talk about the issue officially. That’s a real challenge to our intelligence and policy community, leaving lots of unanswered questions about China’s strategic doctrine, capabilities and intent as Beijing bolsters its armed forces — while avoiding arms-control agreements.
As such, senators need to take time not only to consider the other salient questions about the new START — but also to figure China into their deliberations on a new treaty with Russia.
Heritage Foundation senior fellow Peter Brookes is a former deputy US assistant secretary of defense. This article first appeared in the New York Post.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.