The men clustered in the shade of trees, in the 32oC heat of a car park in Atlanta, form the lowest layer of the US’ so-called middle class.
They stare, alert like greyhounds, at the vans leaving the hardware store. When one pulls up, they rush, 15 or 20 together, to the driver’s window to negotiate. The hired man leaps in with his bag of tools — he will earn US$10 an hour, cash, for basic building work.
However, even the lowest layer has layers within — the Hispanic men are recent migrants; mainly young. The African-Americans are older, gaunt.
“They’re only hiring Mexicans,” one tells me, and gives a hard-faced stare when I ask why.
At Goodwill, a charity-run job center in Atlanta, Georgia, you can meet the next layer up — former legal clerks, accounts secretaries, computer technicians — the whole story of black self-advancement is present in this room, but now it’s all one story. Most have been out of work for months, some for years.
Go to the pristine cul-de-sacs where this supposed middle class lives and you will find, every couple of streets, a lawn as high as a wheat field, indicating a home that has been repossessed. Even the survivors hang on by a thread.
Juan and Kenyoda Pullen have been renting here since their home was repossessed. Sometimes the rent does not get paid. When they lost their jobs — as postman and bank clerk — their combined income dropped from US$75,000 to US$14,000 a year.
Do you still feel middle class, I ask them. They do, they say: “Though we’re not really certain what that means any more.”
The US’ “middle class” was always a construct of ideology, indeed the expression of a dream. For the black and Mexican casual workers in the car park, the dream is the thing they have in common — they are there because they prefer work to welfare. They believe themselves to be entrepreneurs and will battle against the economic headwind to the point of self-abasement to avoid admitting otherwise.
Yet the middle class in the US is disappearing. A lifestyle sustained for 30 years by rising debt is dissolving as the credit dries up and the question beyond the crisis is: Can it ever come back?
Figures released last month by the US Census Bureau show it will be hard. Middle incomes are lower, in real terms, than in 1999. The median income, stagnant for a decade, fell by 4.2 percent once the crisis hit. Since December 2007, more than 6 million Americans have been pushed below the official poverty line.
It is dawning on millions that the term middle class might be a misnomer, but the label “working class” does not fit either — in the US it denotes a lifestyle choice involving trade union activism or support for the grittier baseball teams, not a sociological category.
This sudden collapse in lifestyle will have economic and psychological impacts long after the crisis is over. Since the 1980s, US growth has been driven by the spending power of the salaried workforce. In turn, the consumer has been the dynamo of global growth.
To get things back to the way they were, the US has to find a way to create 9 million jobs, plug the gap in disposable incomes and reopen the personal credit system to the millions excluded from it. Judged against that, the fiscal stimulus plans of US President Barack Obama have failed.
The credit system, having created the crisis, compounds the agony. The “payday loan” stores — shameless and neon amid the closed-down high streets — do brisk business. So do the credit reference agencies — Juan Pullen told me he had actually been refused a job because the employer had checked his credit score.
“They think credit indicates -character, bad credit equals bad character,” he shrugs.
Unable to borrow or earn, a whole generation is being shut out of the US lifestyle.
Meanwhile, some states have begun a race to the bottom — slashing welfare, labor regulations and local taxes to attract investment. High-wage companies close and relocate to low-wage states, and foreign investment flows to the towns where labor costs are lowest. These states are being transformed by the arrival of low-waged Hispanic migrants, even as the right-wing politicians who support the economics rail against the demographics.
As a result, the so-called Sun Belt, identified by Republican strategist Kevin Phillips in the 1970s as the new political bedrock of conservatism, now feels like the unhappiest place in the US. Median incomes in the south are, on average, US$8,000 lower than in the northeast. Poverty rates are higher than anywhere else in the US — and so are the racial and religious tensions.
In the midterm elections, politicians have promised to “do something” for the middle class. The kindest thing they could do is tell the truth: Americans have been living a middle-class lifestyle on working-class wages — and bridging the gap with credit. It’s over.
In a free-market society the real middle class is always a minority — if your street has a gate and a security camera at the end of it, then you are middle class. A real middle-class kid can afford a college education, not a Web-based degree. The real middle-class family does not skip meals or find its automobiles trapped in the repair shop because of unpaid bills.
Even in the US, if you are standing in 32oC heat, jostling with 30 other guys for a few hours’ work, it is the man in the station wagon curling his finger at you that is middle class — not you.
Paul Mason is a journalist with the BBC’s Newsnight program.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry