Chinese writer and dissident Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) was recently awarded the Nobel Peace Prize — the first time the award went to a Chinese national. This drew protests from Chinese officials as well as international attention because the recipient is an imprisoned Chinese activist.
While some Chinese dissidents think that Liu is not qualified to receive the award, the general consensus seems to be that it was a brave choice by the Norwegian Nobel Committee and that it would arouse global interest in China’s atrocious human rights record while encouraging people in China to fight for freedom.
Before the decision was made, Chinese Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Zhai Jun (翟雋) warned the Norwegian Nobel Committee face-to-face about what would happen if it gave the award to a Chinese dissident. However, the committee did not show any fear or back down.
We can pretty much say that online discussions in the West show what most people there think. Many of the comments said it was laughable that US President Barack Obama received the prize last year, and that this year’s decision to give it to a Chinese dissident was the right choice.
Along with its economic and military rise in recent years, China has expanded its dominance internationally while also imposing increasingly strict policies on its own citizens. Many leaders of pro-democracy movements have been imprisoned, as have many Christians and Falun Gong practitioners. Reports from some human rights organizations state that over the last decade, more than 100,000 Falun Gong practitioners have been locked up in labor camps and more than 3,000 have been tortured to death.
Liu was sentenced last year to 11 years in jail for writing six online articles. That equates to approximately two years of prison time per article.
With an eye on China’s vast market, many leaders in the West have failed to effectively speak out against China’s suppression of human rights. Sanctions have not been imposed on China, and Beijing is able to get away with whatever it wants.
The fact that the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to a Chinese dissident this time around is a blow to the Chinese regime. The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) reaction has been a mixture of embarrassment, anger and fear, and it has tried everything possible to block news of the prize in the country.
However, there have also been reports that many people inside China have been letting off fireworks and celebrating the event. So, this is cause for worry for the CCP, but a happy occasion for the Chinese people.
In announcing the recipient of this year’s Nobel Peace Prize, the Nobel Committee stated: “China is in breach of several international agreements to which it is a signatory, as well as of its own provisions concerning political rights ... The campaign to establish universal human rights also in China is being waged by many Chinese, both in China itself and abroad.”
Through the severe punishment meted out to him, Liu has become the foremost symbol of this wide-ranging struggle for human rights in China.”
This is almost tantamount to saying that giving the prize to Liu is a form of moral support to the whole human rights movement in China.
This year’s Nobel Peace Prize has been like a beam of light — it has been a source of trouble for Beijing and allowed people around the world to see its darker side, while at the same time encouraging China’s democracy movement.
Cao Changqing is a freelance writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry