Last week about a dozen female migrant workers accused their employer, AV Tech Corp in Taipei County, of installing surveillance cameras in their dormitory and spying on their every word and move. If their accusations that eight cameras had been installed, including one over the bathroom door, prove to be true, it would be one more in a litany of gross infringements of foreign workers’ rights and it should be no surprise if it provokes anger at home and abroad.
Think about it. If these workers were Taiwanese, would they be subjected to this kind of invasive management and surveillance? Such spying would be unacceptable even in army barracks, never mind staff dormitories. In other settings, spying on women’s private lives would only be done on the sly, because it’s a crime. Whoever made recordings from spy cameras wouldn’t dare show them around and discuss them openly. Perhaps the only places where the law allows such intrusive surveillance are pigsties and chicken coops. Clearly those who would spy on a worker dormitory see them as less than human.
Why would managers dare do something so outrageous and lacking in even the most basic respect for these foreign workers? It is a matter not just of individual wrongdoing, but of failings in the system. Taiwan’s laws governing migrant workers put them in a situation where their rights are easily trampled on and their status is little better than that of slaves.
Taiwan treats migrants as “guest workers” — a polite way of saying they can be used and then thrown away. They are only temporary guests and they can be sacked and deported any time. Since they can’t change employers, they have to put up with whatever treatment they receive. They have no voting rights and no social support network. They are unfamiliar with Taiwan’s legal system and other avenues through which they might seek help, so there are very few people willing to speak up for them. Besides, the government, by means of an administrative order, practically denies foreign workers the possibility of ever getting Republic of China citizenship, so they don’t even have the chance of becoming future citizens.
In Taiwan, where electoral votes are always politicians’ primary concern, how many legislators or political figures would take an interest in the rights of foreigners who will never vote?
Under this system, migrant workers’ response to exploitation and humiliation is usually just to grin and bear it. When the setup makes it so hard to call for help, telling people about their problems might not do any good. Remember what happened in Kaohsiung in 2005, when Thai construction workers, frustrated after repeated complaints fell on deaf ears, finally cracked and rioted. Five years later, incidents of migrant workers being driven to the end of their tethers continue to occur. Why? Because our laws are designed to create a group of workers who are easy to exploit. It is true that since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office, his government has made changes to the system that have brought considerably improved protection for immigrants — especially those who have come for marriage. When it comes to migrant workers, however, the system has hardly changed and remains akin to slavery.
The experience of other countries tells us that malicious attitudes and discrimination, be they based on community, gender or class, are often directed at “outsiders” such as immigrants and migrant workers. Taiwanese wouldn’t treat workers or women from their own country so outrageously. It’s just because these people belong to a different nationality and don’t have enough protection under the law that bosses and labor brokers can act so unscrupulously, showing the ugliest side of human nature.
In the latest incident, AV Tech’s management said it wasn’t clear about the situation because its workers’ dormitory is run by labor brokers. This illustrates another problem with the system governing foreign migrant workers in Taiwan, which is that it relies too much on brokers. Slavery doesn’t tolerate runaway slaves, so the system takes employers to task when their foreign employees go missing. Since employers have neither the ability nor the time to keep tabs on their employees’ whereabouts, they rely on “experienced” brokers to manage and monitor migrant workers. This is usually the case both for caregivers and those working in factories like AV Tech’s. Without doubt, brokers’ role in labor management gives them excessive power over the lives of migrant workers.
That brokers are relied on so much tends, both on paper and in practice, and intentionally or otherwise, to slant the situation in their favor. Even though employers who want to extend migrant workers’ contracts could employ them directly, in practice they still seek the services of labor brokers.
Bosses rely on brokers, and brokers can keep on demonstrating that bosses can’t do without them. Direct employment is just a pretense, and employers have no qualms or questions about what the brokers might be doing.
So if we want to really get rid of exploitation and bullying of migrant workers, it is not enough to go after employers or brokers. What needs to be done, and urgently, is to thoroughly reconsider the present system that comes so close to slavery. Only then will foreign migrant workers, who have made and continue to make such great contributions to the country, no longer have to suffer bullying and humiliation.
Bruce Liao is an associate professor of law at National Chengchi University and adviser to the Alliance for Human Rights Legislation for Immigrants and Migrants.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China