The Commonwealth has abandoned its commitment to defending human rights, according to a leaked document obtained by the Guardian in which the secretary-general tells his staff it is not their job to speak out against abuses by the 54 member states.
British Prime Minister David Cameron and British Foreign Secretary William Hague have both said they will put new emphasis on the Commonwealth in Britain’s foreign policy. However, the organization’s London-based institutions, the secretariat and the charitable foundation, are both in turmoil, riven by disputes over their purpose and direction, as well as internal wrangles over the treatment of staff.
Coming soon after the well-publicized shortcomings in India’s preparations for the Commonwealth Games, the latest revelations about dysfunction within the secretariat and foundation are likely to add to questions over what the Commonwealth is for. The most threatening internal rupture is over human rights. Staff at the secretariat were furious when the Secretary-General of the Commonwealth of Nations Kamalesh Sharma remained silent over a series of abuses by member states in recent years.
For example, when Gambian President Yahya Jammeh threatened to behead homosexuals in 2008; when government troops and Tamil Tiger rebels were accused of widespread atrocities at the end of the civil war in Sri Lanka last year and when a Malawi court in May sentenced a gay couple to jail for being homosexual, the secretary-general ignored calls from secretariat staff urging him to express concern at least.
“All those cases were all about the values the Commonwealth is supposed to stand for and we failed,” one staff member said. “I feel we could become moribund.”
In response to complaints from employees, the secretary-general’s office told his staff that the institution had no obligation to pronounce on the issue.
“The secretariat ... has no explicitly defined mandate to speak publicly on human rights,” Sharma’s office told senior staff. “The expectation is that the secretary-general will exercise his good offices as appropriate for the complaint and not that he will pronounce on them.”
Human rights activists said the comments represented a reversal of the Commonwealth’s tradition of speaking out over gross abuses, such as apartheid. They said the secretary-general was contradicting a key policy document adopted by Commonwealth heads of state in 1995 that calls for the “immediate public expression by the secretary-general of the Commonwealth’s collective disapproval of any such infringement” of democratic values and fundamental human rights.
Purna Sen, head of the secretariat’s human rights unit, said on Friday: “We have been accused of being over-cautious. Our work below the radar is extremely important, but we need to explore more fully where we can make public statements. Public comments need not be condemnations, but we need to defend our values.”
Others question whether quiet diplomacy by the secretariat has been effective, as states have little to fear from the Commonwealth.
Danny Sriskandarajah, director of the Royal Commonwealth Society, said: “I recognize the Commonwealth often works behind the scenes, but without public achievements on its values it will lose credibility.”
“Many of the Commonwealth institutions were created in the 1960s and have structures and hierarchies that now seem outdated. It needs to modernize its institutions if it wants to be fit for purpose in the 21st century,” he said.
The Commonwealth Foundation, a charitable trust that promotes cooperation between professional bodies in member states, has also been split since a decision last year to cut direct funding for HIV and AIDS prevention programs by more than half.
The internal dispute came to a boil last October when the woman in charge of the programs, Anisha Rajapakse, was suspended, escorted out of the foundation and then summarily dismissed, on the basis of allegations by an intern.
According to the foundation, the intern alleged that Rajapakse had tried to persuade her to forge a letter purported to come from a civil society group complaining about the cut in funding.
However, the intern, Elizabeth Pimentel, wrote to the foundation’s board of governors in August distancing herself from the allegations.
In her letter, a copy of which has been obtained by the Guardian, Pimentel said her name had been “wrongly connected” with the disciplinary action against Rajapakse, and that she had not wanted remarks she made to the management “to be construed as a complaint at any point.”
“My discussions have been misinterpreted and used out of context,” she said.
Rajapakse and Pimentel both refused to comment on the dispute, which is due to go before an employment tribunal in December.
Two other members of the foundation’s 20-strong staff have started grievance procedures against its director, Mark Collins.
“There is a climate of fear at the Foundation. Everyone is afraid of doing something the director does not like because of what happened to Anisha,” a secretariat staff member said.
Collins said it was an “undesirable situation” to be the focus of so many staff complaints at the same time, but denied that there was any systemic problem at the foundation.
He said Pimentel had not formally withdrawn her original allegation against Rajapakse.
“At the time, she felt that an investigation was justified,” he said, suggesting Pimentel had since become “fearful” over the impending employment tribunal.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.