For more than two decades, Carlo Petrini has been gently nudging the world toward “good, clean and fair” food, signing up 100,000 people in 163 countries to his Slow Food movement.
“Philosophically, finding slowness again is essential. We need to take a small, homeopathic dose of it every day, to come back to a life rhythm that is more bearable,” the 61-year-old Italian said an interview in Rome.
Slow Food, whose symbol is a red snail, promotes food that is “good at a sensory level,” but also aims to educate people about traditional and wholesome means of production and defend biodiversity in the food supply.
“We are not old-style gourmands only interested in taste or the recreational side of things. Food needs to be clean and not destroy the environment like intensive livestock farming does by polluting water tables,” Petrini said.
“The producer should not be paid too little and neither should immigrants who have come to Europe” illegally, to work at the lower end of the food production chain, he said.
Founded in 1986, Petrini’s movement is headquartered in the small town of Bra in the northwestern Italian region of Piedmont, about 50km from Turin, an area that thanks to the movement has become a capital of high-quality food production.
“Over the past 50 years, food has lost its value, it became a commodity. We destroyed our agricultural society and with it the chance for young people to come back to the land,” Petrini said.
Petrini laments that the share of young farmers has fallen from 50 percent after World War II to just 3 percent today.
“Should development be synonymous with multinational companies, genetically modified organisms and the ownership of seeds, or with small communities using virtuous means of production that can feed millions of people?” he asks.
Slow Food began as a protest against fast-food culture in Italy, but soon spread to Germany, Switzerland and the rest of the world.
Today it sponsors food festivals and takes stances on sensitive food issues: It has issued a manifesto in defense of the consumption of raw milk and one on the future of seeds and seed-ownership.
It also defends and promotes about 300 presidia — foods whose traditional production risks being abandoned — like the Garbagna Bella cherry in Piedmont or Noire de Bigorre cured ham in southern France.
Petrini’s movement is pulling in the opposite direction to bodies like the Rome-based UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which advocates massively increasing food production to feed a growing world population.
However, he dismisses suggestions that its goals are utopian or unrealistic.
“On the ground, the FAO has people who do serious work, but over the past 20 years, none of the goals they have set — like the goal of halving the number of hungry people by 2015 — has been achieved,” Petrini said.
Slow Food’s impact is hard to measure, but many of the movement’s projects have so far been a success.
The food festivals it organizes, from the biannual cheese festival in Bra to the Slow Fish festival in the port city of Genoa, are consistently packed.
In late August a sprawling 5,000m2 “Eataly” food emporium, for which Slow Food acts as “strategic consultant” opened in Manhattan, modeled on the original Eataly market launched in Turin in 2007.
Young foodie entrepreneurs from Piedmont close to Slow Food, like the artisanal ice cream maker Grom or microbrewers selling Italian artisanal beers, are successfully exporting their products and opening boutique foodstops in New York and Tokyo.
Slow Food will bring 4,000 traditionally minded farmers and breeders from communities around the world together in Turin late this month for a five-day food fair.
“We won’t be changing the world, but the humble of this earth need to be listened to. We are aware of our size, we are a small association. But now it’s civil society that pushes politicians, not the other way around,” Petrini said.
Sign of the spreading message, Petrini was recently invited to speak to 280 physicians at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at a meeting that was streamed to the White House and viewed by first lady Michelle Obama.
“We don’t know how far we will go, we will see. Slowly, slowly,” he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.