As land prices in Taipei County’s Sinjhuang (新莊) set record highs in recent land auctions and housing prices in Taipei City remain elevated, the government faces mounting pressure to show that it is capable of dealing with rampant property speculation, since few believe its efforts so far have proved to be effective.
Aside from the central bank’s small interest rate increases, several credit-tightening measures on housing loans and the ban on sales of state-owned properties in Taipei, there is little sign the government will impose more measures on the domestic real estate market ahead of the special municipality elections on Nov. 27.
The government and the public have a lot to think about after the central bank’s announcement on Thursday of a 0.125 percentage point increase in key interest rates was not accompanied by any additional credit-tightening measures for the housing market.
The rate increase — the second this year — met market expectations, since the nation’s economic fundamentals are strong and still-high property prices in the greater Taipei area warranted further upside in the central bank’s key interest rates to help normalize its monetary policy.
However, market-watchers are left to wonder about the central bank’s decision to forgo any new credit-tightening measures on housing loans in addition to those announced in June, and not to adopt stricter rules for land mortgages.
Even though the latest government data showed on Monday that the nation’s outstanding loans for home purchases reached a record level of NT$5.054 trillion (US$163 billion) in August and loans offered by local lenders to construction companies also surged to a decade-high of NT$1.17 trillion in August, the central bank’s answer on Thursday to the still-hot property market was just to urge lenders to adopt proper rules on land financing and encourage them to strengthen mortgage risk management through moral suasion.
One possible reason the central bank did not announce new measures to target land mortgages, or loans using idle land as collateral, could be that it did not want to take any drastic steps to dampen the housing market and, in turn, hurt the overall economy.
The bank could also be in the process of proposing possible measures on land mortgages and might make them formal policies if the land speculation situation worsens, following similar steps recently taken by its Asian peers. In China, for instance, the government on Monday announced a set of new measures to curb land hoarding by developers, banning them from bidding for more properties if they either have property that has lain idle for more than a year or possess illegally transferred land.
If the central bank does take harsh steps to target rampant land mortgages, many expect it will need support from other government agencies to tackle the problem. The Ministry of Finance set up a mechanism in May that allows it to repurchase auctioned public land greater than 100 ping (330.6m2) in the Taipei area if the plot remains idle for up to three years. Unfortunately, that mechanism is not retroactive for plots of land that were sold before May.
A final possible explanation, perhaps the most accurate one, is the government’s political considerations ahead of the special municipality elections and fear of a backlash from businesses.
When a reporter approached central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) with this question after a press conference on Thursday, Perng simply laughed and gently pushed the reporter away. While Perng did not respond to this question directly, his gesture offers plenty of room for interpretation.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs