The Taipei mayoral election is seen as a crucial battlefield in the five special municipality elections scheduled for the end of November. It will be a significant scalp for whichever party takes it, and much hinges on this battle, which will determine the success or failure of the Taipei International Flora Expo.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leadership has ordered all hands on deck to secure Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin’s (郝龍斌) re-election and has set up a task force to defeat his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) rival, Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌). Even President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) joined the fray in the last few days. Hau should find the support of the party helpful, but in the end he has to save himself.
The KMT caucus and the Taipei City Government have been trying to dispel the cloud of suspicion brewing over the inflated prices of flowers and other items bought for the expo, but they have concentrated almost exclusively on diversionary tactics. The latest approach is to claim that the expo is about art and culture, which require purchases that cannot be made in the same humdrum way everyday office items are bought. That is disingenuous to say the least. Of course you cannot put a price on art, but that is no license for being frivolous.
Everyone knows the market sets the price of art, not the artists themselves. Who is the renowned artist or artists behind what the KMT would have us believe are the expo masterpieces? Who was the architect for the buildings and displays? And what of the individual purchases, at many times the market price? Did the money really find its way into the hands of the “artists,” or was it mislaid, pocketed by contractors or returned as kickbacks?
It is important that Taiwan host a successful international flora exposition. The question is how best to achieve this. The expo is supposed to highlight Taiwan’s indigenous flora, but the flower season is in the spring and summer. Hau, however, chose to open the expo in November to coincide with the elections. The majority of Taiwan’s native flora comes from the center and south of the island, not Taipei City, the political center of the country. The timing and location of the expo was chosen by the KMT to fit its own interests. It’s no wonder the DPP sees it as an easy target.
In a bid to help Hau, Ma accused the DPP of disloyalty to the nation, saying that spoiling the expo would hurt Taiwan, and not help the DPP. Yes, the public should unite behind an event that showcases the nation, but that doesn’t mean a blind eye must be turned to everything. There is right and there is wrong.
The budget estimate submitted by Hau’s team rose from NT$3 billion (US$94.5 million) initially to NT$7 billion, and some city councilors have now put the figure at NT$14 billion. The city government has taken responsibility for more than NT$9 billion. This use of public funds is unacceptable.
The Taipei City Government has tried to explain away the purchasing scandal by saying that the unit price of individual plants is irrelevant, as the tender was awarded to a contractor as a whole, and the contractor would delegate jobs to sub-contractors. However, even if estimates for each plant, individual projects, designs, souvenirs and ticketing were wildly far off the mark, it would still be difficult to believe that the total would come close to the overall cost reported. Even the lowest bid represents a huge waste of funds.
This is why the prosecutors had to be called in to investigate possible corruption. The real challenge to the success of the expo is the fact that the authorities involved thought no one would check their accounting.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry