The rapid proliferation of military drone planes and armed robots should be subject to international legal controls, conferences in London and Berlin will argue this month.
Public awareness of attacks by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), such as Reapers and Predators, in Afghanistan and Pakistan has grown, but less is known of the evolution of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs).
Two conferences — Drone Wars in London on Saturday and a three-day workshop organized by the International Committee for Robot Arms Control (ICRAC) in Berlin from tomorrow until Wednesday — will hear calls for bans and for tighter regulation under international arms treaties.
British academics and policy experts, Red Cross representatives, peace activists, military advisers, human rights lawyers and those opposed to the arms trade are participating in the German meeting.
The development of what is known as “autonomous targeting” — where unmanned planes and military ground vehicles are engineered to lock automatically on to what their onboard computers assume is the enemy — has heightened concern.
Research is under way at enabling UAVs and UGVs to work in collaborative swarms, ensuring each machine selects a different target. This has reinforced fears that UAV strikes along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border and in the Horn of Africa — or wherever future wars are fought — will increase death tolls.
British air force (RAF) pilots already operate armed drones from Creech US air force base in the Nevada desert — 13,000km away from the frontline where they release Hellfire missiles and Paveway bombs against Taliban targets.
Through a freedom of information request submitted to the UK Ministry of Defence, the UK-based Fellowship of Reconciliation — the group organizing the Drone Wars conference — found that as of April this year, RAF-controlled Reapers had opened fire on 84 occasions so far this year.
Defense equipment manufacturers insist that there is always “a man in the [control] loop” to authorize operations and that they are far less indiscriminate than the high level air force saturation bombing that occurred in World War II. Since there is no onboard pilot at risk, so the argument goes, they do not always have to fire first.
Critics highlight the number of civilian casualties in supposedly “surgical strike” raids, alleging that reliance on remote screens may induce a dehumanizing electronic games mentality in operators, and fear that such clandestine missions could lower the threshold for war — for example in Yemen and Somalia where the US is not involved in any formal conflict.
Philip Alston, a UN human rights special rapporteur, warned last autumn that US use of drones to kill militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan may violate international law. He called on the US to explain the legal basis for killing individuals with its drones.
“More than 40 countries have robotic programs now,” said Noel Sharkey, professor of robotics and artificial intelligence at Sheffield University, England, who is speaking at both conferences this month. “Even Iran has launched a UAV bomber with a range of several hundred miles. These [robotic] systems are difficult to develop, but easy to copy. In the [United ] States, a large proportion of robot making is being moved to Michigan to compensate for the decline in the car industry. Increasingly, [the manufacturers] are talking about the ‘man on the loop,’ where one person can control a swarm of robots. Our biggest concern for the future is autonomous systems that [select] targets themselves.”
For many scientists, the future potential is most alarming. David Webb, a professor of engineering at Leeds Metropolitan University, England, vice-chair of the UK Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) and an expert on the militarization of space, addressed the Drone Wars conference in London. “We are only just starting to become aware of the wider issues,” he said. “Robots are [being developed] to make some decisions for themselves. If they kill somebody by mistake, do you put the robot on trial? The idea of having networked UAVs that work in swarms and could be armed has all sorts of implications.”
Dr Steve Wright, a lecturer in applied global ethics at Leeds Metropolitan University who will speak at an ICRAC workshop on the dangers of terrorists obtaining drones, said: “We need a new treaty to limit proliferation. All the arms fairs now are selling UAVs. It’s naive to think they will remain in the hands of governments.”
The UK government has defended the use of RAF-controlled UAVs in Afghanistan. An spokesperson said: “The rules of engagement used for Reaper weapon releases are the same as those used for manned combat aircraft: The weapons are all precision guided and every effort is made to ensure the risk of collateral damage and civilian casualties is minimized. This may include deciding not to release a weapon.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry