Stability equals prosperity
In June, we had the chance to participate in the Formosa Foundation’s Ambassador Program for students. We enjoyed this unique two-week experience in Washington featuring workshops with many outstanding officials and academics, and meetings with members of Congress and their staffers. The goal of the program was to improve US-Taiwan relations.
Many of the participating speakers appreciated Taiwan’s current efforts to stabilize cross-strait relations, and were critical of the tense partisanship of Taiwanese politics and the ensuing instability. Similarly, as an American and a Taiwanese, we are saddened to see many frictions among Taiwanese who counteract each other’s endeavors to help their country. To prosper — we believe — Taiwan should strive to achieve domestic and regional stability.
We are aware of Taiwan’s history and understand the deep-seated emotions prevalent in modern Taiwanese politics. While having watched the movie Formosa Betrayed, we were deeply moved by the tragedy of the murder of the Lin family and professor Chen Wen-chen (陳文成), and we feel great respect for the pioneers of Taiwanese democracy.
However, we are very concerned about the continued and deeply entrenched antagonism between pan-green and pan-blue political factions. Political prosecution, corruption and other misdeeds of the past should not be forgotten, but the lessons they teach cannot be learned by “hating the others.” If parochial enmity continues to supersede pragmatism, the care for the people and the pursuit of common interests, it might bring some short-lived media attention for the instigators, but it will hurt Taiwan’s democracy, its society and its reputation abroad.
Those who fail to reach out and to bridge opposed parties may fail democracy as a whole. Some of our young Taiwanese friends have become reluctant to vote and turn their heads away from politics in disgust for corruption, endless partisan bickering and physical violence in the Legislative Yuan. Taiwan’s political system cannot afford to be ridiculed and to lose younger generations.
We believe it is possible for Taiwan to preserve its de facto independence, if Taiwanese spend less time fighting each other and more on fighting together for the issues of common interest to them. Taiwanese who prefer self-determination over political coercion hold the key to success in their own hands.
They will prevail by opening their minds to new ideas, by working together with political adversaries for common interests to truly address the needs of the Taiwanese public, by involving foreigners and inviting them to Taiwan to strengthen social networks between this beautiful country and the rest of the world and by educating foreigners (including visiting mainlanders) about Taiwan. This will help Taiwan find its inner peace, strengthen its institutions and increase its credibility abroad. It will also boost its self-confidence in foreign policy.
We are confident that Taiwan will rise to the challenge. Taiwanese people have shown their ability to excel in vastly different fields. If Taiwan is able to define and to strengthen its own identity with which all of its people can associate, it will be able to withstand the strongest storms.
Adrian Ineichen
Zurich, Switzerland
Lin Chia-yin
Taipei
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations