Taiwan is trying to put some teeth into a new law aimed at combating cyberbullying and cyberstalking, among other things. Pundits are already saying that the age of information liability will have truly begun here when the Revised Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法) takes effect early next year. According to Benjamin Chiang (江逸之), writing in the Chinese-language CommonWealth magazine, the “strict new stipulations will put virtually everyone in Taiwan at risk of unknowingly breaching the Personal Data Protection Act, with possible [large] fines.”
When it was first introduced, the act applied only to eight industries, according to Chiang, but the revised act applies now to all industries and individuals in Taiwan. In particular, cyberbullying and cyberstalking (and cyberflaming — the tarnishing of a reputation online) will no longer go unpunished, and things such as posting an article or photo of someone else on the Internet or in a personal blog will be considered, under the law, to be “leaking’’ personal data, if the person concerned has not given his or her approval.
The new regulations will also give lawyers some important new ways to combat abuse of the Internet. Other countries, including the US and nations in Europe, might want to study Taiwan’s preparations.
In addition to cyberbullying, such things as “human flesh hunting” — a term coined originally in China (ren-rou sou-suo, literally, “people meat hunting”) and a growing phenomenon worldwide — will be seen as a violation of the revised act. This is where groups collectively investigate, expose and sometimes harass individuals perceived as doing wrong, and entails the unauthorized posting of private information on the Internet “in the name of justice.”
Given the provisions of the act, lawyers representing people who try to fight cyberbullying and cyberstalking will have more artillery in their arsenals to fight such cybercrimes. Even flaming other people in forums and blogs will be subject to legal action, if those flamed wish to press charges.
All this is a good thing. For too long, the Internet has gone unchecked and unmoderated, allowing anyone to post almost anything about almost anyone else online, without fear of repercussions or legal action. Now the laws here against cyberbullying will have teeth, and cyberstalkers and forum flamers will not be able to operate freely anymore. While the Internet at first was seen as a magic wonderland of convenience and free communication, it has become a monster as well.
To give an example, a female law professor at a national university recently sued 100 people over what she termed “Web insults.” The professor was the target of hundreds of flames and cyberattacks after she appeared on a TV show last spring arguing for the abolition of the death penalty in Taiwan.
The professor’s televised remarks triggered angry online criticism, with some people saying things like: “There is a hole in her brain,” “you are retarded” and “moron professor.”
Those were the nice remarks. One cyberbully wrote to her: “I hope your daughter gets raped and killed late at night.”
According to a recent Taipei Times article, the law professor filed lawsuits against 31 people in May and sued 69 more in the summer.
Media reports said that many of the people who insulted her were highly educated, with about 50 people already called in and questioned by investigators. And this has transpired even before the new regulations go into effect next year.
If the Personal Data Protection Act has any legal teeth and can be enforced, online cyberbullying and insults might become a thing of the past in this country. Then again, lawyers might fight the law, too.
Dan Bloom is a US writer based in Taiwan.
Taiwan is not an orphan nation in need of someone to adopt it. Taiwan is not a foundling nation wandering the streets of the world looking for a home. It is not even a poor waif of a nation unable to take care of itself in that same big, bad world. Finally, Taiwan is certainly not terra nullius, a nationless land that is open and waiting to be explored and possessed by those who dare. Taiwan is a mid-sized, democratic nation that by GDP, profitability, location and even microchip production punches far above its weight in its region and in international commerce.
When analyzing Taiwan-China tensions, most people assume that the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) consists of rational actors. Embedded within this belief are three further suppositions: First, Beijing would only launch an attack on Taiwan if it were in China’s national interest; second, it would only attack if the odds were overwhelmingly in its favor; and third, Chinese decisionmakers interpret information objectively and through the same lens as other actors. These assumptions have underpinned recent analyses — including by Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) — concluding that there is no
Do you remember where you were last year at this time? Do you remember what it was like? Here in the leafy suburbs of Washington, D.C., we were in lock-down mode. The streets were bleak and empty. Schools, offices, malls, theaters, churches … all were closed. The essentials were in short supply. Grocery stores rationed the good stuff. Signs read: “One jumbo pack of toilet paper, two cartoons of eggs per family please!” Some days those signs mocked us from barren shelves. It was a lonely and anti-social time. Families and friends had to weigh the rewards of gathering together to celebrate Christmas
While Taiwan still has a long way to go regarding cultural sensitivity and respecting differences, an incident last week involving discrimination against Aborigines was malicious and should not be condoned. It is even sadder to see that the offenders are students at Fu Jen Catholic University (FJU), one of the top private schools in the nation, and that not only did their hateful words not receive any mainstream media coverage, but most of them remain unapologetic. Aboriginal members of the Fu Jen Lumah Association were practicing singing outside due to a lack of space. Their late-night practice bothered some students in