The health risk assessment in connection with the third-stage expansion of the Central Taiwan Science Park is the main reason why the environmental impact assessment (EIA) for the park has resulted in opposition between the public, industry and government. The misunderstanding and misuse of the risk assessment principles and methodology have led to flawed conclusions regarding the health risks to Houli residents and misjudgments as to the size and significance of their impact on Houli Township (后里).
The risk assessment methodology used in international academic risk analysis circles entails using the most accurate scientific information and the most effective methods available. This means the resulting risk value will be as close as possible to the actual risk to the things being assessed and an accurate reflection of the risk to which local residents would be exposed.
The results of the health risk assessment for the Central Taiwan Science Park fall short of international standards. This is because the assessment process did not allow for a comprehensive appraisal to be made of the high background risk created by existing pollutants, heavy metals and dioxins. Health risk is calculated by multiplying the observed adverse effect level by hazard probability. In other words, if a chemical substance has been determined to be harmless, its observed adverse effect level would be zero, as would the health risk.
However, the actual risk was underestimated, for two reasons. First, the list of hazardous substances used for the risk assessment was incomplete. Second, since it was not possible to determine how many hazardous substances were on the list, their observed adverse effect level was assumed to be zero.
Taiwanese health statistics show that Houli ranks among the top 10 percent of places in Taiwan in terms of cancer incidence and cancer mortality rates. The fact that the risk of getting cancer in Houli is much higher than the Taiwanese average is not reflected in the risk assessment for the science park.
The view that it is acceptable to rationalize the risks of the science park development because the excess relative risk (ERR) is low, is flawed. This is because such a comparison is based on national averages for individuals and townships, and therefore is not applicable to Houli township and its residents, where background environmental health risks are clearly much higher than the national average.
Houli needs to reduce risk, not to increase ERR. The members of the EIA committee should not spuriously pass the amendment to the impact assessment for the third development stage of the science park simply because they do not have access to complete and comprehensive risk information. If they do, they will create a moral crisis because the people making the health risk assessment and the members of the EIA committee themselves will be seen as indifferent to the risk of harm to Houli residents.
For a risk management decision to be more in line with public healthcare ethics, we would first need to have a risk improvement plan in the Houli region to reduce the health risk to local residents. Since the factory buildings for the science park expansion have already been completed and manufacturing equipment has already been installed, a reasonable risk management approach would be to require that complimentary measures aimed at reducing existing risk be put in place before ERR can be allowed to increase.
Existing risks are mutually reinforcing, and this has contributed to the present high-risk environment. To determine how far relative risk would have to be reduced to make sure Houli residents no longer live in a high risk environment, a more complete risk assessment is required.
A second stage EIA is one possible way to resolve the dispute over the park’s current EIA. The Environmental Impact Assessment Act (環境影響評估法) says that once a development project has been determined to have entered the second EIA stage, a request can be made that the developer collect more in-depth data of a wider scope and over a longer period. This would reduce the uncertainty inherent in the environmental impact and the health risk assessments.
It would also ensure a higher degree of accuracy based on the EIA and stop the Environmental Protection Administration from violating the law and the Constitution. Investors would also have a more stable environment to operate in, and innocent and vulnerable Houli residents would no longer have to live in a high risk environment.
Chan Chang-chuan is a professor at National Taiwan University’s Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.