Is the government’s money being well spent? One can’t help but ask the question given the recent string of reports on just how free-handed the government has been with taxpayers’ money.
On Tuesday, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wong Chin-chu (翁金珠) said that the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) had asked for a marketing and promotions budget of NT$178 million (US$5.5 million) for next year. That figure is a five-fold increase from last year’s NT$32 million.
Reports also emerged yesterday that Taoyuan International Airport Co — the company that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications is launching on Nov. 1 to take over management and operation of the airport — plans to spend NT$323.4 million renovating the airport’s bathrooms from next year through 2013.
Then there was the announcement from the Ministry of the Interior yesterday that the individual who came up with the slogan “Children are our most precious treasures” for its birth promotion slogan competition would receive a cash award of NT$1 million.
The list of financial largesse wouldn’t be complete without mentioning the whopping — and overpriced, as Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) has admitted — sum the city government has spent on flowers and other items for the Xinsheng Overpass’ beautification project and the Taipei International Flora Exposition.
Against the backdrop of mounting national debt — with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration racking up a deficit of NT$1.42 trillion — the way the government spends taxpayers’ money has left many wondering whether it knows how to prioritize public needs.
For instance, rather than spending the bulk of its funds on advertising and promoting the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), wouldn’t it be better spent holding a referendum and letting the public have its say? Ma has brushed off the need to hold an ECFA plebiscite, saying it would be too costly. But wouldn’t a budget of NT$178 million devoted solely to publicity be just as pricey — if not for Ma, at least to many members of the public?
As for renovating the airport’s bathrooms, with a total of 90 toilets in the two terminals, does the government need to spend NT$3.6 million per toilet to improve the situation? As Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) rightfully said, the point is not how much money is being spent, but whether the management has the heart and the will to keep the facilities and services on par.
As for the slogan competition, would “Children are our most precious treasures” encourage more people to have babies? It’s unlikely. Although NT$1 million might not seem like much in the eyes of the government, to the ordinary person it is money that could have been better spent elsewhere.
The number of elementary and junior high school students unable to afford school lunches surged to 226,000 last year. Imagine how many youngsters could have their stomachs filled if the government knew how to better appropriate funds to care for them. Or how about using some of the money to fund schools struggling to send their players to compete abroad?
When a government fails in setting its priorities, it’s the public who suffers.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with