On Aug. 11, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) released an anti-Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) advertisement on the Internet and on television. The footage was filmed in Hong Kong and featured Hong Kong residents speaking in Cantonese about how the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) signed with China in 2003 has caused greater disparities between the rich and poor. The DPP released this advert in an attempt to warn Taiwanese not to accept the ECFA.
While this advertisement reflected local realities in a broad sense, it was not sufficiently detailed in some areas.
For example, eight out of 10 Hong Kong street cleaners are not university graduates, but the problem runs deeper than this. Each year, there is no increase in the student quotas at Hong Kong’s universities, but students from southern China are competing for places in universities with Hong Kong students. Hong Kong’s Vocational Training Council had so many applicants for the program that people lining up at their offices caused chaos and the online registration system crashed because too many people were using it.
This is worse than university graduates having to sweep streets for a living because now many Hong Kong residents do not even have a chance to attend university. This is what will happen in Taiwan once students from China are allowed to study there.
Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister Christina Liu (劉憶如) has said that the CEPA has not increased the disparity between rich and poor in Hong Kong and that it has in fact shrunk the gap. However, this is not the reality.
Late last month, the Hong Kong Housing Authority, which was established to handle public housing, announced that 19-year-old houses close to Lok Fu station were selling for hugely inflated prices of up to HK$4.65 million (US$598,155). In the past, such government housing was hard to sell for HK$2 million, even after subsidies, because they lacked the luxury of houses built by private developers.
Why are these houses, which were built for middle and lower income earners, now being sold for such outrageous prices? If the CEPA did not cause this, what did? If it was for some other reason than the cheapest housing is now overpriced, why are so many people living in those dilapidated, substandard houses the DPP showed in their anti-ECFA advertisement?
If the ECFA really goes ahead, today’s Hong Kong will become the Taiwan of tomorrow. And there is a good chance that Taiwan will become even worse. After seeing the DPP’s advertisement, many people in Hong Kong felt it represented their feelings.
The DPP should make an even more detailed description of the situation in Hong Kong and an even more accurate description of the problems Taiwan may face once the ECFA takes effect and once Chinese students hit Taiwan’s universities.
There is no need to exaggerate things. All the DPP has to do is tell Taiwanese the facts. I wonder how long those people who blindly support the ECFA will be able to cheat the people of Taiwan and Hong Kong?
Martin Oei is a political commentator based in Hong Kong.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with