As early as 3.4 million years ago, some individuals with a taste for meat and marrow — presumably members of the species best known for the skeleton called Lucy — apparently butchered with sharp and heavy stones two large animals on the shore of a shallow lake in what is now Ethiopia.
Scientists who made the discovery could not have been more surprised. They said the cut marks on a fossilized rib and thighbone were unambiguous evidence that human ancestors were using stone tools and sometimes consuming meat at least 800,000 years earlier than previously established.
The oldest confirmed stone tools are less than 2.6 million years old, perhaps from only a little before the emergence of the genus Homo.
Some prominent researchers of early human evolution were skeptical, saying the reported evidence did not support such claims.
If true, though, the new find reveals unsuspected behavior and dietary habits of the Lucy species, Australopithecus afarensis. Though no hominid fossils were found near the butchered bones, A. afarensis is thought to be the only species living in this region at the time. The species’ large teeth with thick enamel indicated it subsisted mainly on tubers and other vegetation.
So the international team of paleoanthropologists, archaeologists and geologists concluded that it had found the first evidence that kin of the 3.2-million-year-old Lucy had used some form of stone tools and would not pass up a chance to feast on a cut of meat and nutritious bone marrow.
Pending new discoveries, the team wrote in a report published on Thursday in the journal Nature, A. afarensis is the only hominid group “to which we can associate the tool use.” Whether these individuals made the tools or only selected naturally sharpened pieces of stone, the scientists added, was not yet determined. Nor is it known whether they were hunters or, more likely, scavengers of a lion’s leftovers.
In any case, the scientists concluded, the butchery evidence “offers a first insight into an early phase of stone tool use” by human ancestors, and it should “improve our understanding of how this type of behavior originated and developed into later, well-recognized stone tool production technologies.”
The leader of the research project, at Dikika, Ethiopia, was Zeresenay Alemseged, an Ethiopian paleoanthropologist at the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco. The lead author of the Nature paper was Shannon P. McPherron, an archaeologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.
“Now, when we imagine Lucy walking around the East African landscape looking for food, we can for the first time imagine her with a stone tool in hand and looking for meat,” McPherron said in a statement issued by the Leipzig institute.
“With stone tools in hand to quickly pull off flesh and break open bones, animal carcasses would have become a more attractive source for food,” he said. “This type of behavior sent us down a path that later would lead to two of the defining features of our species — carnivory and tool manufacture and use.”
“Our future work will be to find those stone tools that have shifted the framework for such an important transition in the behavior of our ancestors,” Alemseged said in a telephone interview before he returned to Ethiopia last week.
David Braun, an archaeologist at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, who was not involved in the research, said “more surprises surely await us” at Dikika.
In an article accompanying the journal report, Braun noted that the conventional perception of A. afarensis as a relatively primitive species was already being reconsidered in some respects. He cited studies showing that “Lucy’s kin had body proportions that were more similar to those of humans than of apes.”
Their short fingers, for example, “would allow the kind of fine-scale manipulation necessary for tool use,” he said.
A recently discovered A. afarensis skeleton did not have an apelike thorax, the part of the body between the neck and abdomen, “usually associated with a large digestive tract and low-quality diet.”
Perhaps the new findings “should not have been so unexpected,” he said.
Still, the discoverers are already being pressed to defend their interpretation that the cut marks on the bones are evidence of stone-tool butchery.
Tim White of the University of California, Berkeley, one of the foremost investigators of early human origins, said flatly that their “claims greatly outstrip the evidence,” and noted, “We have been working sites in this area for 40 years, and not a single stone tool has been found in deposits of this antiquity.”
Sileshi Semaw, a paleoanthropologist at Indiana University who was a discoverer of the oldest confirmed stone tools, from 2.6 million years ago, noted in an e-mail from Ethiopia that researchers had often been misled by bone markings left by trampling animals and other natural causes.
“I am not convinced of the new discovery,” he said.
Alemseged braced for such reactions with confidence.
“Few if any will doubt the authenticity of the cut marks, once they examine the evidence,” he said in an interview. “No one will question the age of the fossils. But who made the cut marks? Maybe there was another, more evolved species around at that time, but that we don’t know. And where are the tools they used? If they were just stones picked up, unmodified, they may be archaeologically invisible, hard to identify.”
The site at Dikika is in the heart of hunting grounds for fossils and artifacts related to human origins. The desiccated country is in the Lower Awash Valley, bordered on the north by Gona (the source of the oldest known stone tools) and Hadar (Lucy’s home).
Four years ago, Alemseged announced the discovery at Dikika of the 3.3-million-year-old skeleton of a girl who died at the age of three — and was dubbed Lucy’s baby.
In January last year, fossil hunters concentrated their search over a surface about 274m from where Lucy’s baby was found. Four bones bore intriguing cut marks. Scientists said that microscopic and chemical tests proved that two of the bones, a right rib from a cow-size ungulate and the femur, or thigh, of a goat-size antelope, were evidence of butchery.
The marks must have been made by stone tools, said Curtis Marean, a member of the team from the Institute of Human Origins at Arizona State University.
“The range of actions includes cutting and scraping for the removal of flesh, and percussion on the femur for breaking it to access marrow,” he said.
Geologists on the team determined the age of the sediments in which the fossils were found to be 3.2 million to more than 4 million years old, based on dating of volcanic ash.
The nearest stone that could have been usable for butchering seemed to be several miles from the site, which the scientists said suggested some premeditation on the part of the hominids. They had perhaps arrived for dinner with their utensils in hand.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.