Amid disunity in the south, campaign blunders in the north and unprecedented challenges to its core identity, former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) was elected to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) 10-member Central Standing Committee on July 18, a move that reverses his pledge to leave politics after losing the 2008 presidential election.
This reversal has caused some to cry foul, saying that Hsieh’s return was an act of political dishonesty, but did anyone seriously think that one of Taiwan’s pre-eminent political animals of the last 30 years would simply vanish based on a promise made in the exhaustion and disappointment of a failed campaign? After all, shortly after the election, Hsieh established a shadow government to monitor the performance of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration. He also became a political commentator and host of his own radio program. What does it mean anyway to say that someone in a democracy “quits politics”?
Perhaps more to the point, can the DPP — or the country — afford to ignore the experience of a man who has spent much of his life in public service?
For anyone new to Taiwan or who has not been paying attention for the last three decades, Hsieh’s resume is worth reviewing. Born in Taipei and educated at Kyoto University, Hsieh served as a defense attorney for those indicted in the 1979 Kaohsiung Incident. He became a founding member of the DPP and initiated the party’s now-disbanded Welfare State Alliance. Hsieh was twice elected Kaohsiung mayor, twice Taipei City councilor, twice legislative lawmaker and once DPP legislator-at-large. In 1996, Hsieh stood as his party’s candidate for vice president in the country’s first popular presidential election. Hsieh twice served as DPP chairman, and in 2005, he was appointed premier.
Unlike more doctrinaire colleagues, Hsieh is a pragmatist. As premier, he advocated reconciliation and coexistence. To survive and develop, Taiwan must engage with others, including China, Hsieh believed, maintaining the only precondition was to protect Taiwanese identity. His conciliatory approach upset many, including those who favored independence and other Cabinet members.
Even his enemies acknowledge qualities deserving respect: intelligence, resourcefulness, resilience and loyalty — something the DPP finds in short supply these days. Forced to withdraw from the Taipei mayoral primary in 1994, Hsieh accepted the party’s choice and endorsed his rival, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who with Hsieh’s help won the election. In 2006, Hsieh again answered the party’s call, this time to run for the Taipei mayor’s post once denied him, knowing very well that his odds of winning were slim.
He is certainly no saint. Often aloof, even arrogant, in relations with others, Hsieh does not suffer fools gladly, which when he was premier seriously limited his dealings with the legislature. Other flaws include a tendency to appear calculating and ambitious. It is essential that Hsieh and members of the former New Tide and Green Alliance factions now put their acrimonious history behind them. Other rivalries must also be carefully managed, such as with party heavyweight and current Taipei mayoral candidate Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌).
Above all, Hsieh must work with DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), whose own pragmatism will hopefully compliment his. Chemistry will be a factor, not something usually associated with Hsieh, who, for all his success, may best be characterized as a political loner.
The future is anybody’s guess, but having smart, experienced and dedicated people on your side cannot be a bad thing. Frank, welcome back.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China