Amid disunity in the south, campaign blunders in the north and unprecedented challenges to its core identity, former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) was elected to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) 10-member Central Standing Committee on July 18, a move that reverses his pledge to leave politics after losing the 2008 presidential election.
This reversal has caused some to cry foul, saying that Hsieh’s return was an act of political dishonesty, but did anyone seriously think that one of Taiwan’s pre-eminent political animals of the last 30 years would simply vanish based on a promise made in the exhaustion and disappointment of a failed campaign? After all, shortly after the election, Hsieh established a shadow government to monitor the performance of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration. He also became a political commentator and host of his own radio program. What does it mean anyway to say that someone in a democracy “quits politics”?
Perhaps more to the point, can the DPP — or the country — afford to ignore the experience of a man who has spent much of his life in public service?
For anyone new to Taiwan or who has not been paying attention for the last three decades, Hsieh’s resume is worth reviewing. Born in Taipei and educated at Kyoto University, Hsieh served as a defense attorney for those indicted in the 1979 Kaohsiung Incident. He became a founding member of the DPP and initiated the party’s now-disbanded Welfare State Alliance. Hsieh was twice elected Kaohsiung mayor, twice Taipei City councilor, twice legislative lawmaker and once DPP legislator-at-large. In 1996, Hsieh stood as his party’s candidate for vice president in the country’s first popular presidential election. Hsieh twice served as DPP chairman, and in 2005, he was appointed premier.
Unlike more doctrinaire colleagues, Hsieh is a pragmatist. As premier, he advocated reconciliation and coexistence. To survive and develop, Taiwan must engage with others, including China, Hsieh believed, maintaining the only precondition was to protect Taiwanese identity. His conciliatory approach upset many, including those who favored independence and other Cabinet members.
Even his enemies acknowledge qualities deserving respect: intelligence, resourcefulness, resilience and loyalty — something the DPP finds in short supply these days. Forced to withdraw from the Taipei mayoral primary in 1994, Hsieh accepted the party’s choice and endorsed his rival, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who with Hsieh’s help won the election. In 2006, Hsieh again answered the party’s call, this time to run for the Taipei mayor’s post once denied him, knowing very well that his odds of winning were slim.
He is certainly no saint. Often aloof, even arrogant, in relations with others, Hsieh does not suffer fools gladly, which when he was premier seriously limited his dealings with the legislature. Other flaws include a tendency to appear calculating and ambitious. It is essential that Hsieh and members of the former New Tide and Green Alliance factions now put their acrimonious history behind them. Other rivalries must also be carefully managed, such as with party heavyweight and current Taipei mayoral candidate Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌).
Above all, Hsieh must work with DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), whose own pragmatism will hopefully compliment his. Chemistry will be a factor, not something usually associated with Hsieh, who, for all his success, may best be characterized as a political loner.
The future is anybody’s guess, but having smart, experienced and dedicated people on your side cannot be a bad thing. Frank, welcome back.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under