The global economy is currently a tale of two worlds. A buoyant East contrasts with a fragile West. The difference is highlighted not just in the economic data, but also in the monetary policies being pursued around the globe.
Across a growing number of emerging market economies, central banks are becoming more concerned about how soon and how fast they should tighten monetary policy.
Perhaps most telling are the recent rate increases in India and Brazil, two major developing economies where prospects look good. However, there are many others who are tightening as they face the challenges of economic recovery. In Asia, in the past month alone, Taiwan, South Korea, Thailand and Malaysia have joined India in raising rates. Of these, it was the first rate hike in the cycle for Taiwan, South Korea and Thailand. In contrast, India and Malaysia have been hiking for some time.
This does not mean that central banks in the West should tighten too; far from it. They face downside, not upside risks. The US, the UK and the eurozone need to keep rates as low as possible for as long as possible. Indeed, given the fragile state of their recoveries, the central banks in the West may have to do even more, through quantitative easing. The contrast with the emerging world could not be starker.
Whichever country one considers, the outlook tends to depend on the interaction between the fundamentals, policy and confidence. The fundamentals in the East are far better than in the West. Meanwhile, the current pressures on both policy and confidence contrast significantly.
There are, of course, some emerging economies where monetary policy is being eased, Sri Lanka and Ghana being examples, and South Africa looks set to ease further. And even across Asia there is speculation that Vietnam, which was among the first to hike late last year, may need to ease. So local factors clearly need to be taken into account. However, even allowing for this, the broader picture is one of differences between the West and the East.
In the West, a double dip recession is the worry, as the impact of last year’s policy stimulus is fading and the private sector is not taking up the slack. To add to the gloom, the tightening of fiscal policy across Europe may ease market worries about sovereign risk but, possibly, at the expense of making a double-dip more likely.
The world economy has been recovering since facing the abyss in the spring of last year. Global trade has also rebounded sharply since hitting bottom in May last year. Yet, an economic correction in the second half of this year always looked likely as the policy boost of last year wore off and as the inventory correction that has been taking place ran its course.
As a result, this is what one might call a below-par recovery. Normally at this stage of a recovery, momentum builds up and confidence rises. Instead, in the West, the summer has seen a period of uncertainty, triggering volatility across markets.
Although it is important not to panic, tightening fiscal policy is a risk. A double dip in the global economy is not guaranteed, but one needs to recognize the contrasting challenges facing different parts of the world. The overhang of debt and the scale of deleveraging will constrain growth in the West for some time. The emerging economies, especially those driven by exports, are not decoupled from events in the West, but they are better insulated. Indeed this is what we saw during the crisis as Asia, for instance, was hit by the slump in global trade, but has since rebounded. Growth opportunities in the East look far better.
Perhaps most attention will be focused on China, given its influence on global trade and on commodity prices. In China, the impact of previous tightening of bank lending is feeding through, slowing the economy.
One can draw an analogy between controlling China’s economy and turning the shower knob in a hotel. It is unlikely you will get the temperature exactly right the first time. Turn the knob too much in one direction and the water turns too hot, turn it the other way and it gets too cold. Eventually you get it just right.
Similarly, with Chinese policy. Eighteen months ago, the Chinese central bank eased monetary policy by relaxing lending controls. Bank lending almost doubled to just under 10 trillion yuan (US$1.48 trillion) last year. At the start of this year, the authorities tried to cool things, slashing the lending target to 7.5 trillion yuan for this year and imposing other restrictions.
These measures are taking effect and thus we should not be surprised by news of a slowdown in China. Yet, policymakers may soon decide that they have gone too far in cooling and by the year-end, they may try and warm things up, giving the economy a boost as it enters next year. The bottom line is that China, like the rest of Asia, is an economy with different challenges — those of success.
Add in the recent move by the Chinese to let their currency appreciate — albeit gradually — and the immediate outlook may well be one of Asian currency appreciation. It may also not be too long before the worries of only a few months ago — namely how to control capital inflows — return to centerstage.
There is a need to see through the present market uncertainty, and recognize the signals from recent data and policy actions. We must not underestimate near-term downside risks in the West. While it may be a sub-trend recovery across the globe, emerging economies look set to experience stronger growth rates.
Gerard Lyons is head of global research and chief economist at Standard Chartered Bank.
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,