From the perspective of a foreign-born and educated, English-speaking scientist, university education and research as practiced by some Taiwanese national universities is a funny thing. Perhaps funny is not the most accurate word; a mixture of reactionary, hypocritical and rigid is a better description. I don’t think there is a single word that adequately conveys the sentiment. Funny, odd and peculiar are polite euphemisms.
As I sit in my office preparing questions for my students’ final exams, I can hear the clamor and bubble of celebration as students bedecked in black gowns lined with ribbons of color and sporting mortar-boards attend graduation ceremonies, and yet graduation depends on passing exams that many of these students have not yet sat or passed. Now that strikes me as a little funny.
I see that master of science and doctoral students must author research papers as a prerequisite to graduate, but the number of students who graduate exceeds the number of authorships. Now that’s also a little odd.
In the courtyards I can see generic signs saying how a university education is a marvelous thing and how truly international the education provided by universities is. I can see the signs that imply that providing courses in English is a marker of just how international this education is. And yet I know first-hand that a great many students and professors alike avoid English-language conversations and lectures whenever possible. And I know the surest way to have an e-mail ignored is to send it in English. Now that’s a peculiar legacy of internationalism.
I attend staff meetings where diligent student representatives listen to long bureaucratic discussions in Chinese by Taiwanese academics who make rules stipulating that students must use English in the classroom. Where are the role models for linguistic internationalization in this environment ?
At meetings I see the knitted brow of the rare foreign guest professor or even rarer foreign employee who listens on uncomprehendingly, unable to advance any opinions based upon alternative experiences garnered from overseas, because of the reluctance of staff to use a language touted as the cornerstone of internationalism. Isn’t that wasteful of the resources spent to bring this professional to Taiwan?
I see that universities run Chinese language courses as components of high-profile university exchange programs with sister cities in far corners of the world, but I also see that foreign research workers and graduate students already working at national universities in Taiwan cannot get time off to attend these showpiece Chinese language classes, or any university-sponsored Chinese classes.
Isn’t it unrealistic to expect internationalism to spread in both directions if foreigners who are already on Taiwanese campuses are kept mute?
At meetings I see some foreign professors proficient in Chinese, English and their subject of expertise who perform the same job with equal competency as their Taiwanese counterparts, yet these same foreign professors are not legally entitled to the pensions their Taiwanese colleagues are, despite making equal contributions to government taxes, health and pension schemes. Where is the internationalism in exploiting a worker based upon their nationality?
I see foreign guest research scientists who cannot utilize their research expertise because they are ineligible to submit independent research applications to the National Science Council. Personalities allowing, guest foreign research scientists and professors can join established Taiwanese research groups to do “more of the same” kinds of research, but they cannot even apply for support to do something new or different unless they can convince a permanent employee of a university to apply for them by proxy. Doesn’t this absolute fettering of ideas seem like a peculiar way to promote internationalism of research?
What is needed to enhance the functional internationalization of the Taiwanese educational experience?
This is a complex question with many facets to the answer, but one thing is for certain: It doesn’t mean rigidly propagating a university education and research system that is so fraught with inconsistencies that it can only be politely described as funny, odd and peculiar.
I can only draw the conclusion that university education in Taiwan is too often a matter of convenience. It is made convenient for all to go, since about 97 percent of Taiwanese who apply to attend universities will find places. It is made modestly convenient for students who can play at graduating before sitting their final exams. University education is a great convenience for university administrators who generally adhere to the existing mass production educational model, decorated with the word “international.”
Unfortunately, functional internationalization of Taiwanese higher education is not a matter of convenience. It is in fact a general inconvenience for all involved. It requires effort to listen to alternatives, to critically access alternatives and adopt the best ideas and practices offered by foreigners and Taiwanese alike. This is not an easy process for anybody. But the first step is to have an open mind and have in place educational bureaucracies that are willing to better utilize the potential of existing personnel and are willing to honestly promote policies that will foster functional internationalism rather than merely paying it lip-service.
Functional internationalization of Taiwanese university educational and research systems will raise the educational standard and ultimately this will benefit all of Taiwan. At present, the labeling of the education that is provided by some national universities as international, is an overstatement. Peculiar — yes, funny — no.
Peter Osborne is a guest professor at a Taiwanese university.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry