He once wielded a knife on the deck of a Japanese whaling ship, slicing apart the behemoths of the ocean in the name of “scientific research,” while much of the rest of the world looked on in horror.
Now, as Japan pushes to overturn the 24-year ban on commercial whaling, the former whaler has come forward with allegations of widespread criminality among the men with whom he spent months in the freezing waters of the Antarctic.
Sent every winter to slaughter the mammals for research that Japan says is vital to our understanding of whale populations, the crewmen are instead seizing and selling prized cuts of meat to earn extra cash and, in at least one case, earn many more times their annual salary, the whaler-turned-whistleblower says.
He refers to himself only as “Kujira-san” (Mr Whale), a precaution necessitated by a genuine fear for his safety. However, the personal risks will be worthwhile, he says, if it means the world learns the truth about the dark side of Japan’s whaling industry.
“Even before we arrived in the Antarctic Ocean,” he says of a recent expedition, “the more experienced whalers would talk about taking whale meat home to sell. It was an open secret. Even officials from the Institute of Cetacean Research [a quasi-governmental body that organizes Japan’s whaling program] on the ship knew what was happening, but they turned a blind eye to it.”
Kujira, who worked aboard the Nisshin Maru mother ship, saw crew members helping themselves to prime cuts of whale meat and packing them into boxes they would mark with doodles or pseudonyms so they could identify them when the vessel reached port.
“They never wrote their real names on the boxes,” he said.
Some whalers would take home between five and 10 boxes, he said, while one secured as many as 40 boxes of prime meat that fetches ¥20,000 (US$220) a kilo when sold legally. One crew member built a house with the profits from illicitly sold whale meat, he said.
“Another used the money he earned to buy a car,” he said. “They were careful to select only the best cuts, like the meat near the tail fin. I never dared challenge them.”
COMMOn PRACTICE
Kujira paints an unpleasant picture of life at sea, although he is reluctant to divulge details for fear of revealing his identity.
Newcomers are badly treated by more experienced whalers, fueled by a machismo culture that is disappearing from other parts of the fishing industry.
“The treatment of junior crew has improved a lot elsewhere over the last 40 years,” he said. “But the industry seems to be trapped in time.”
He contradicted Japan’s claims that the industry, which reportedly required government subsidies of almost US$12 million in 2008-2009, is highly efficient. The fleet would sometimes catch more whales than necessary, he said, strip them of their most expensive parts and throw what was left overboard.
“I didn’t think of the embezzlement at first. I just couldn’t stand the waste. A lot of meat was being thrown away because we kept catching whales even after we’d reached our daily quota. I decided I had to tell someone what was happening,” he said.
Oddly, perhaps, for someone with his professional background, he sought help from Greenpeace. In 2008, the organization launched a secret investigation into embezzlement by the crew of the Nisshin Maru, during which two activists, Junichi Sato and Toru Suzuki, intercepted a box containing 23kg of whale meat — worth about ¥350,000 — at a warehouse in Japan that they later presented as evidence.
‘TOKYO TWO’
After initially agreeing to act on their claims, prosecutors dropped the case and instead, Sato and Suzuki were arrested and charged with theft and trespassing.
Last week, prosecutors demanded an 18-month prison sentence for the “Tokyo Two,” who were held without charge for 23 days and interrogated while strapped to chairs without their lawyers present. A ruling is expected in the next few months.
Kujira’s allegations come as the International Whaling Commission (IWC) prepares to meet next week in Morocco to discuss a proposal that could end the moratorium on commercial whaling in return for whaling nations agreeing to smaller quotas. In the run-up to the meeting, Japan has reverted to its preferred tactic of using aid to sway small islands and even landlocked nations to vote with it in the 88-member body.
Under the IWC moratorium, Japan is permitted to catch just under 1,000 whales — mainly minke — in the name of scientific research. Meat from the cull is sold on the open market and the profits used to fund future whaling expeditions.
Japan denies allegations of vote-buying, but has acknowledged that it invests heavily in the fishing industries of some IWC allies and pays the expenses of delegates from poorer countries.
Kujira says Greenpeace’s investigation has forced whaling crews to change their ways. He adds that he will continue to campaign behind the scenes, at great risk to his own safety, until the Japanese public learn the truth about the industry.
“I dread to think what the other whalers would do to me if they knew who I was. They could do anything they wanted to me. I would be living in fear of my life,” he said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations